Advanced Search Results

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Chindha Fakira Patil (Decease ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 231(A), 23(2), 28, 53 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 and 27(1); Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 90 to 107

Reported in : 2007(2)BomCR370

Advocate for Appellant : N.B. Patil, A.G.P. in Civil Application Nos. 6522 of 2002 in First Appeal No. 659 of 2001, 6520 of 2002 in First Appeal No. 660 of 2001, 6513 of 2002 in First Appeal No. 661 of 2001, 6515 of 2002 in F

N.V. Dabholkar, J. 1. These ten appeals under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (henceforth, 'the said Act') read with Order 41 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (by virtue of Section 53 of the...

Gajanan Uddhaorao Garole Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secreta ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 5; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules - Rule 9

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR170

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Patil, Adv.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. Heard Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the appellant, Shri Ahirkar, learned AGP for respondent No. 1 and Shri Parchure, learned Counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3. Admit. Taken up for final hearing...

Saindranath S/O Jagannath Jawanjal Vs. Pratibha Shikshan Sanstha, Thro ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4E, 4(6), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 12, 13, 15, 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 16(3); Industrial Disputes Act; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1987; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129; Mumbai University Act, 1974 - Sections 42A to 42F, 42C(3) and 42D(2); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Maharashtra Employees Private Schools (Conditions) Rules, 1981 - Rules 26, 27, 28, 28(2), 28(3), 28(4), 28(5), 29, 31, 33, 34, 36, 36(2), 37 and 38; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Rules, 1984; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107, 10

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR281; 2007(3)BomCR527; 2007(3)MhLJ753

Advocate for Appellant : Ujwala Patil, ;A.D. Mohagaonkar, ;Anil S. Mardikar and ;A.Z. Jibhkate, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This Reference has been made on account of conflict of views expressed by the Division Benches of this Court regarding the powers of the School Tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Maharashtra...

Surendra Ramchandra Taori Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)2079; 2002BomCR(Cri)128; (2002)104BOMLR34

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Patil

J.N. Patel, J.1. The petitioner who is a journalist and working as reporter of Daily Hindusthan published from Amravati, is a resident of Malkapur town in Buldhana District. The petitioner was required to invoke the extraordinary...

The State of Maharashtra Through Manikpur Police Station Vs. Dilip Pre ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 149, 302, 307, 376, 376(2) 380 and 452 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 235(2), 354(3) and 428; Evidence Act - Sections 118

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR2453

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Borulkar, Public Prosecutor and ;A.R. Patil (APP)

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The above confirmation case has been filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking confirmation of death penalty imposed upon the original Accused Nos.1 to 3 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, by his...

Shri NitIn Himanshu Sinha and ors. Vs. Shri Pankaj Narayan Karva and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - section 406 rw. 34; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 482, 405, 406

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Rajiv Patil; Sachin Punde, Advs.

1. Mr.Rajiv Patil learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners, out of the reliefs prayed, are pressing the Petition only for the relief of quashing and setting aside Crime no.621 of 2007 and investigation effected...

Hanmabai W/o Iranna Patil Deceased through her LR's Dattatraya S/o Ira ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9 and 18

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR380; 2009(4)MhLj805

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Gorde Patil, Adv.

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard Mr. Gorde Patil, learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mr. S.P. Dound, learned A.G.P. for the Respondents.2. The present First Appeals preferred by the Appellants/original claimants against the Judgment and award dated...

Ravi Chabiram Sharma Vs. R.H. Mendonca, Commissioner of Police and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5-A; Constitution of India - Article 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR271; 1999BomCR(Cri)271; 1999CriLJ2960; 1999(1)MhLj839

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Tripathi, Adv.;Rajiv L. Patil, Addl. P.P.

ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. Through filing this writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-the detenu himself -has challenged the order of detention passed by the first respondent Mr. R.H. Mendonca,...

Shri NitIn Himanshu Sinha Vs. Shri Pankaj Narayan KarvA.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Patil

JUDGMENT [PER P.D. KODE,J.] :- 1. Mr.Rajiv Patil learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners, out of the reliefs prayed, are pressing the Petition only for the relief of quashing and setting aside Crime no.621...

Anusayabai and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1993ACJ528

Advocate for Appellant : Arundhati Patil, Adv.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. See, where our procedural legal system has landed the appellants.2. The story-pathetic as it is-shorn of minor details can be told thus:The appellants-the old mother, the widow, two unmarried minor daughters and a...