Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: patel · Page 1 of about 28,486 results (1.352 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 28 1991

Patel Jagrutiben Kalabhai (Minor) and Etc. Etc. Vs. Gujarat Secondary ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-28-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1992Guj45; (1991)2GLR1250

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Patel, Adv.

ORDER1. This group of petitions are filed by the petitioners under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for an appropriate writ, direction and/or order directing the respondent-Board to declare the result of the students who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2006

Lubi Electricals Ltd. Vs. A.T. Painter

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-19-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10(3), 12, 13 to 15, 17, 20(3) and 25; Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 2(22); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 227

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ122Guj

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Patel, Adv. for Petitioner 1; T.R. Mishra, Adv.; Mu

H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. K.M. Patel for petitioners, Mr. Sunit Shah, learned Govt. Pleader for the State Authority. Learned Advocates Mr. Mukul Sinha as well as Mr. T.R. Mishra for respective Union.2. By...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2004

Ambalal Somabhai Parmar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-21-2004

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 70; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)3GLR557

Advocate for Appellant : B.S. Patel, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 and; Ranjan B. Patel, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3

M.R. Shah, J.1. Rule. Shri K.P.Raval, Learned AGP waives of rule on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.2. In the present Special Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 01 2004

Rekhaben Yogendrakumar Maniar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-01-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : I(2005)DMC85

Advocate for Appellant : Mukesh A. Patel, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1-2

C.K. Buch, J.1. Heard learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. Other side, though served, is not present. It is submitted by learned advocate Mr. Mukesh A Patel appearing for the petitioner that on earlier occasion the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2003

Gopiraj Dedraj Agrawal (Gopiram Tudraj Agrawal) Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-19-2003

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 84C; ;Bombay Land Revenue Code - Sections 135B; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2004)1GLR237

Advocate for Appellant : Jitendra M. Patel, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1-6/1

K.A. Puj, J. 1. The petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the Joint Secretary, Revenue Department (Disputes), State of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, in Revision Application No. 46...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2001

Mahadev Bhagwanji Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-24-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3424

Advocate for Appellant : A.J. Patel, Adv.

H.H. Mehta, J.1. This is a Criminal Revision Application under Sec. 397 read with Sec. 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the 'Cr.P.C.') filed by the original accused of Criminal Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2002

Cit Vs. Upnishad Investment (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-02-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Guj)176

Advocate for Appellant : Manish R. Bhatt, Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt, Bharat B. Naik & Tanvish U. Bhatt, for the Revenue R.K. Patel, B.D. Karia & Mehul K. Patel, for the Assessees

M.S. Shah, J.In these references, where there are more than one assessee in a reference, the Registry shall give separate reference numbers for different assessees that is to say that there shall be a separate reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1991

Kantilal Manilal and Co. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-19-1991

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1993LC206(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri J.C. Patel, Adv., i/b., ;M/s. C.R. Patel & Co.

Pendse, J. 1. The controversy in this petition lies in a very narrow compass and has been determined by several decisions of this Court. The petitioners are the transferees of REP Licence and on the strength...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2008

Mehta Mody and Co. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-02-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD and 269UD(1)

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR350; (2008)220CTR(Bom)353; [2010]321ITR307(Bom); 2008(4)MhLj642

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Patel, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Petition, the petitioners are challenging an order dated 25-2-1993 passed by the Appropriate Authority being the respondent No. 1 herein under Section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1973

Chhotalal and Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Morvi and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-18-1973

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 139(1), 139(2), 139(4), 139(5), 139(8), 142(1), 144, 148, 183, 184(7), 264, 271, 271(1), 271(4A) and 274; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : [1976]105ITR230(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : K.C. Patel, Adv.

Divan, C.J.1. Some questions of law regarding some of the sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', are involved in these three petitions and, therefore, we will dispose of the three...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial