Advanced Search Results
Dilip Dattatraya Pukale and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-02-1986
ConsumerCriminal
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 3 and 7
1986(3)BomCR505
P.S. Patankar, Adv.
V.S. KOTWAL, J.1. An unusual phenomena was noticed when the sample of milk was collected by the Food Inspector, purporting to be skimmed milk and the report of the Public Analyst as well as the certificate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnandrao Ganpatrao Sable Vs. Madhavrao Ramrao Kanase and anr.
Mumbai
Nov-22-1988
Tenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(2), 12(3) and 13(2); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1987; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule22
1989(1)BomCR256
P.S. Patankar, Adv. in W.P. 3617
A.D. Tated, J.1 Both the writ petitions arise out of the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Satara on 26th April, 1988 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 257 of 1987 whereby he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHanmanta Laxman Thorat and ors. Vs. Dhondavvabai Hanmanta Thorat and o ...
Mumbai
Sep-30-1976
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 11, 12 and 16
AIR1977Bom191; (1976)78BOMLR675
P.S. Patankar, Adv.
1. This is defendants' appeal against an appellate decree of the Extra Assistant Judge, Sholapur, dismissing their appeal against the decree passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Akkalkot, declaring that the respondents Nos. 1 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramkrishna Narayan Patekar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Dec-23-1982
Criminal
Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66(1)
1983(1)BomCR280
P.S. Patankar, Adv.
M.P. Kanade, J.1. The petitioner was prosecuted for offence under section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act in a Summary Case No. 180/1981. It is alleged by the prosecution that the petitioner was found dealing in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Shriniwas R. Shelar Vs. Girish Kanhaiyalal Oswal
Mumbai
Oct-12-2000
TenancyProperty
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 215; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1), 16 and 17B; Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 15 and 20
2001(2)BomCR12; (2001)1BOMLR47; 2001(1)MhLj541
Mr. M.D. Pokale, Adv.
ORDERD. G. Deshpande, J.1. The contempt petition is filed by the tenant and civil application is filed by the landlord. (For the sake of convenience the parties herein after referred to as the landlord and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKothari and Company Vs. Cit
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-07-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)204CTR(MP)298
S.C. Bagadia with D.K. Chhabra, for the Assessee A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.This is an appeal filed by the assessee under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter for brevity called 'the Act'), against an order dated 9-4-2001, passed by Tribunal, Indore in ITA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsstt. Cit Vs. Om Prakash Porwal
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-09-2004
Direct Taxation
[2004]141TAXMAN281(MP)
A.P. Patankar, for the Appellant
ORDERAM. Sapre, J.This is an appeal filed by the revenue (Income Tax Department) under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against an order, dated 10-4-2003, passed by ITAT in IT (SS) A. No. 27/Ind/2002.2. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Om Prakash Bagadia
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-18-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN637(MP)
A.P. Patankar for the Applicant.
ORDERSapre, J.The decision rendered in this appeal shall also govern disposal of ITA No. 60 of 2003, as both these appeals arise out of common order and secondly, appeals arise between the same parties.2. This is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.J. Kapani Vs. Uoi
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-05-2001
Direct Taxation
[2002]121TAXMAN229(MP)
Patankar, for the Assessee
ORDERSapre, J. Petitioner claiming to be an industrial consultant by profession and resident of Indore has filed this petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) essentially against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Smt. Anita Chouhan
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-22-2005
Direct Taxation
[2008]296ITR691(MP); [2006]155TAXMAN136(MP)
A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue.
ORDER1. This is an appeal filed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against an order, dated 11-2-2005, passed by learned Members of ITAT in ITA No. 494/IND./2004.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »