Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: parveen anand · Page 1 of about 50 results (0.063 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 19 1997

Fedders Lloyd Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Fedders Corporation a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-19-1997

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsLimitation

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 46(l)(6) and 46(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)53; 1997(2)ARBLR84(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT474; 1997(43)DRJ410

Advocate for Appellant : Parveen Anand,; Binni Kalra,; Manmohan Singh,;

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The two petitioners had filed a petition against Fedders Corporation (the first respondent) for removal of the Trade Mark No. 175253 and in the alternative for rectification. The second respondent is the Registrar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2012

Samsung Electronics Company Limited and Another Vs. Kapil Wadhwa and O ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-17-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Parveen Anand, Mr. Anand

MANMOHAN SINGH, J. 1. By this order, I propose to dispose of IA No.7774/2011 filed by plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 Code of Civil Procedure,1908 and IA No.10124/2011 filed under order XXXIX Rule...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1996

Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Locks and Locking Devices (India)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-08-1996

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1997IAD(Delhi)573; 65(1997)DLT346; 1997(40)DRJ321

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Bansal,; S.K. Bansal,; Parveen Anand and;

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The plaintiff has filed the suit claiming the propriety right in trade mark Vijayan for selling locks and handles. The defendant is also using the same trade mark Vijayan for selling the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 27 1992

Weston Electronics Ltd. Vs. Weston Industries and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-1992

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi340; 1992(23)DRJ443

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Parveen Anand

ORDER1. This is a suit filed by Weston Electronics Limited, hereinafter called the plaintiff for permanent injunction and rendition of account on the ground that in 1986 the plaintiff adopted the trade mark WESTON in respect...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2017

Tosiba Appliances Co. Pvt. Ltd vs.kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-2017

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Ms. Priyam Mehta

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF DECISION:1. T MAY , 2017 + CS(OS) No.2356/1998 TOSIBA APPLIANCES CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Preet Pal Singh with Ms. Priyam Mehta,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1996

Gyan Devi Saxena Vs. Mohinder Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-1996

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16; Evidence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 8, Rule 1(6) - Order 26, Rule 9 - Order 32, Rule 2; Indian Lunancy Act, 1912 - Sections 18 and 19

Reported in : 1997IAD(Delhi)617; 65(1997)DLT764; 1997(40)DRJ538

Advocate for Appellant : Atul Kumar, Adv

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The Plaintiff No.1 Mrs. Gian Devi wife of K.S. Saxena and plaintiff No.2 Smt. Bimal Saxena wife of Shri Mohan Saxena who is the daughter of plaintiff No.1 have filed the above...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1997

Metropol India (P) Ltd. Vs. Praveen Industries India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-29-1997

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 104; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28

Reported in : 1997(43)DRJ279

Advocate for Appellant : Parveen Anand,; Binni Kalra and; V.P. Ghiraya, Advs

Devinder Gupta, J.(1) These two appeals arise out of same order passed on 18.1.1996 in is 14791/91 in Suit No.3877/91 by the learned Single Judge of this Court partly allowing the plaintiff's application under Order 39...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1982

The Tata Oil Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Reward Soap Works

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-22-1982

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(4)

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi286; 1982(3)DRJ399; 1982RLR618

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Anand,; Parveen Anand and; K.L. Aggarwal, Advs

H.L. Anand, J.(1) Tata Oil Mills Company Ltd., plaintiff, in a suit based on infringement of trade marks, copyrights, passing off and for rendition of accounts of profits, seeks to restrain the defendant, during the pendency...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1982

Tobu Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Joginder Metal Works and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-31-1982

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Design Act, 1911 - Sections 51

Reported in : ILR1983Delhi451

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Anand,; Parveen Anand and; Mohan Vidhani, Advs

H.L. Anand, J. (1) The quesction that thispplication raises is as to entitlements of the plaintiff to restrain the defendants from manufacturing, selling or offering for sale tricycles, said to bear the design claimed to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1987

Kamlapati Khatri Vs. Sharda Prakashan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-06-1987

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 33(1987)DLT392

Advocate for Appellant : Parveen Anand,; Hemant Singh and; J.K. Seth, Advs

B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) This is an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and Civil Procedure Code . praying for an injunction restraining the defendants from publishing literary work 'BHUTNATH.' (2) The case of the plaintiff is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial