Advanced Search Results
Fedders Lloyd Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Fedders Corporation a ...
Delhi
Sep-19-1997
Intellectual Property RightsLimitation
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 46(l)(6) and 46(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137
1997VIAD(Delhi)53; 1997(2)ARBLR84(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT474; 1997(43)DRJ410
Parveen Anand,; Binni Kalra,; Manmohan Singh,;
K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The two petitioners had filed a petition against Fedders Corporation (the first respondent) for removal of the Trade Mark No. 175253 and in the alternative for rectification. The second respondent is the Registrar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamsung Electronics Company Limited and Another Vs. Kapil Wadhwa and O ...
Delhi
Feb-17-2012
Land Acquisition
Mr. Parveen Anand, Mr. Anand
MANMOHAN SINGH, J. 1. By this order, I propose to dispose of IA No.7774/2011 filed by plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 Code of Civil Procedure,1908 and IA No.10124/2011 filed under order XXXIX Rule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Locks and Locking Devices (India)
Delhi
Nov-08-1996
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
1997IAD(Delhi)573; 65(1997)DLT346; 1997(40)DRJ321
K.G. Bansal,; S.K. Bansal,; Parveen Anand and;
K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The plaintiff has filed the suit claiming the propriety right in trade mark Vijayan for selling locks and handles. The defendant is also using the same trade mark Vijayan for selling the same...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Weston Electronics Ltd. Vs. Weston Industries and Another
Delhi
Jul-27-1992
Intellectual Property Rights
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2
AIR1992Delhi340; 1992(23)DRJ443
Shri. Parveen Anand
ORDER1. This is a suit filed by Weston Electronics Limited, hereinafter called the plaintiff for permanent injunction and rendition of account on the ground that in 1986 the plaintiff adopted the trade mark WESTON in respect...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTosiba Appliances Co. Pvt. Ltd vs.kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba & Ors
Delhi
May-01-2017
Intellectual Property
Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Ms. Priyam Mehta
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF DECISION:1. T MAY , 2017 + CS(OS) No.2356/1998 TOSIBA APPLIANCES CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Preet Pal Singh with Ms. Priyam Mehta,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGyan Devi Saxena Vs. Mohinder Singh
Delhi
Dec-20-1996
PropertyContract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16; Evidence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 8, Rule 1(6) - Order 26, Rule 9 - Order 32, Rule 2; Indian Lunancy Act, 1912 - Sections 18 and 19
1997IAD(Delhi)617; 65(1997)DLT764; 1997(40)DRJ538
Atul Kumar, Adv
K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The Plaintiff No.1 Mrs. Gian Devi wife of K.S. Saxena and plaintiff No.2 Smt. Bimal Saxena wife of Shri Mohan Saxena who is the daughter of plaintiff No.1 have filed the above...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMetropol India (P) Ltd. Vs. Praveen Industries India
Delhi
Aug-29-1997
Intellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 104; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28
1997(43)DRJ279
Parveen Anand,; Binni Kalra and; V.P. Ghiraya, Advs
Devinder Gupta, J.(1) These two appeals arise out of same order passed on 18.1.1996 in is 14791/91 in Suit No.3877/91 by the learned Single Judge of this Court partly allowing the plaintiff's application under Order 39...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Tata Oil Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Reward Soap Works
Delhi
Apr-22-1982
Intellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(4)
AIR1983Delhi286; 1982(3)DRJ399; 1982RLR618
N.K. Anand,; Parveen Anand and; K.L. Aggarwal, Advs
H.L. Anand, J.(1) Tata Oil Mills Company Ltd., plaintiff, in a suit based on infringement of trade marks, copyrights, passing off and for rendition of accounts of profits, seeks to restrain the defendant, during the pendency...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTobu Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Joginder Metal Works and ors.
Delhi
Aug-31-1982
Intellectual Property Rights
Design Act, 1911 - Sections 51
ILR1983Delhi451
N.K. Anand,; Parveen Anand and; Mohan Vidhani, Advs
H.L. Anand, J. (1) The quesction that thispplication raises is as to entitlements of the plaintiff to restrain the defendants from manufacturing, selling or offering for sale tricycles, said to bear the design claimed to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamlapati Khatri Vs. Sharda Prakashan and ors.
Delhi
Oct-06-1987
Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
33(1987)DLT392
Parveen Anand,; Hemant Singh and; J.K. Seth, Advs
B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) This is an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and Civil Procedure Code . praying for an injunction restraining the defendants from publishing literary work 'BHUTNATH.' (2) The case of the plaintiff is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »