Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: paresh parekh · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2000

Ram Gopal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-10-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302

Reported in : 2000(2)MPHT353; 2000(3)MPLJ458

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh Parekh, Adv.

S.P. Khare, J.1. Appellant Ram Gopal has been convicted under Section 201 I.P.C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to a fine of Rs. 5000/-.2. The prosecution case was that accused Ram Gopal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2002

Uttam Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-01-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8 and 118

Reported in : 2003CriLJ560

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh Parekh, Adv.

P.C. Agarwal, J.1. Appellant stands convicted by 7th Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhopal in S.T. No. 282/89 (State of M. P. v. Uttam Singh) under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code ('Code' for short) by impugned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2001

National Plastic Industries Ltd, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-2001

Subject : Excise

1. The penalties have been imposed for the reason that the applicant kept a large quantity of its goods, involving duty of Rs 80.00 lakhs in place other than the premises approved under Rule 47.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 12 2002

Commissioner of Cus. (Ep) Vs. Virendra Kanshiram Gandhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-12-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(155)ELT128Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The above applications have been filed by the Revenue for stay of operation of the impugned order of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai by which he has confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 9,74,52,797/- against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2003

National Plastics (i) Ltd., Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-18-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)(166)ELT488Tri(Mum.)bai

1. On 13.07.1999 a show cause notice was issued to the appellants proposing to confiscate goods stored outside bonded store room, though they were entered in Daily Stock Account RG1 and tallied with the physical stock....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2002

Paresh M. Parekh, Yogesh B. Vs. the Chairman, Securities and

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Oct-08-2002

Subject : MRTP

1. These four appeals are directed against the Respondent's four orders, all dated 19.2.2002. By the said orders the Appellants were prohibited from dealing in securities market for a period of two years.The factual data relating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2002

Virendra Kumar Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-12-2002

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC591; 2002LC489(Bombay); 2002(143)ELT508(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Diwan and ;R.M. Azim, Advs. i/b., V.G. Rege, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. Heard Mr. Diwan in support of this petition Mr. Rana appears for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Mr. Patel appears for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5/Respondents added in view of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial