Advanced Search Results
Usha Dube (Mrs.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-21-2004
Service
Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1969 - Rule 26(1)
RLW2004(3)Raj1653; 2004(2)WLC287
Paras Kuhad, Adv.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.(1). The petitioner who was appointed as Additional District & Sessions Judge in the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Services on probation, seeks to quash the order dated October 7, 1998 of the State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-29-2003
Labour and Industrial
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Ordinance, 1997; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7I and 16(1)
[2004(102)FLR419]; (2004)IIILLJ391Raj; 2003WLC(Raj)UC735
Paras Kuhad and; Sunil Nath, Advs.
K.S. Rathore, J.1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the Ordinance of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short the Act of 1952) and The Employees'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.C. Khandelwal Vs. Chairman, Board of Secondary Education and ors.
Rajasthan
Jul-15-1982
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1983Raj16; 1982()WLN449
Paras Kuhad, Adv.
ORDERG.M. Lodha, J. 1. This is a student's writ petition who has appeared in the Higher Secondary Examination in the year 1982 in Science group. He has been awarded an aggregate of 80% and 86% marks...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan Breweries Ltd. and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-21-2000
CivilBanking
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 19(25) and 20
[2004]120CompCas793(Raj)
Paras Kuhad, Adv.
AR. Lakshmanan C. J.1. The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. is the petitioner in this writ petition. The writ petition was filed with the following prayers ;(i) to quash the order dated October 13, 2000, passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatnalaya Diamond (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Rajasthan
Aug-29-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]138TAXMAN128(Raj)
Paras Kuhad for the Assessee R.B. Mathur and R.S. Rathore for the Revenue.
ORDER1. As questions of law and fact involve in the instant writ petitions are analogous, 1 propose to dispose them by a common order.2. The petitioners in these writ petitions seek the following reliefs:(a) To quash...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Kumar Rawat and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
May-31-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)210CTR(Raj)553; RLW2007(4)Raj3133
Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. These two special appeals are directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge dt. 14th Sept., 1994 [reported as Krishna Kumar Rawat and Ors. v. Appropriate Authority and Ors. (1995) 123 CTR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.K. Ghosh and 7 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-16-1984
Service
1985(1)WLN65
Mr. Paras Kuhad
K.S. Sidhu, J.1. The petitioners in the eight writ petitions, listed above, are officers of the Rajasthan High Court, holding the posts of 'Private Secretaries attached to the Chief Justice and Judges' appointed as such by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Hotels Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-02-2007
Civil
2007ACJ198
Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Under challenge in this special appeal is the judgment dated 22-1-2007 passed by the learned single Judge whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant against the show cause notice issued by Collector...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Gaindi Devi Vs. Secretary, Community Development and Panchayat De ...
Rajasthan
Oct-13-1987
Service
1988(2)WLN193
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. Whether we are entering twenty first century via seventeenth century? Whether this shameful stigma of exploitation of a woman employee by payment of Re. 1/- per day as salary and wages in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Modern Syntex (India) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Dec-01-2006
Company
[2009]148CompCas843(Raj); [2007]76SCL157(Raj)
Mr. Paras Kuhad, Mr. Chagla
ORDERShiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. This petition under Section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short 'Act of 1956') has been filed seeking sanction of scheme of compromise to be binding on all the secured creditors...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »