Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: pankaj mithal · Page 1 of about 308 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 14 2004

Cwt Vs. Smt. Rajmani Devi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-14-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]145TAXMAN397(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mahajan for the Revenue. Pankaj Mithal for the Assessee.

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad has referred the following question of law under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act) for opinion of this Court:'Whether on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2006

Arun Kumar Vs. Viith A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-2006

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 14, 20, 20(2), 29A, 29A(4), 29A(5) and 29A(6); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC2051

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal, Adv.

Bharati Sapru, J.1. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Pankaj Mithal, Sri K.C. Saxena learned Counsel for the contesting respondents and have perused the entire record.2. The facts of the case are that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2005

Charan Singh Son of Jageshwar Singh Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretar ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-05-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1963 - Rule 68; Minerals Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2005All230; 2005(3)AWC2302

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal and ;Shubham Agrawal, Advs.

R.P. Misra and A.P. Sahi, JJ.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent - State Government in respect of the grant of mining lease to the respondent No. 3 over plot No. 29/3,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 2002

Shiv Kumar Sharma and anr. Vs. Vth Additional District Judge, Muzaffar ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-14-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 17

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1518

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners, who are the tenant of non-residential accommodation (shop), have challenged the orders dated 7.3.1984 and 10.3.1989,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2002

Jamal Vs. Iqbal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-12-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20(4)

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC961

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal, Adv.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking quashing of the Judgment and order dated 1.5.2002 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2003

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Nagar Mahapalika Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-07-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC1951

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2002

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Bhikkhoo Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-11-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47

Reported in : (2003)1UPLBEC577

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal, Adv.

B.K. Rathi, J.1. The compensation was awarded to the opposite party No. 1 in Land Acquisition Reference No. 60/70/94 by order dated 27.7.1999 passed by IVth Additional District Judge, Kanpur Nagar. The revisionist was dissatisfied with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2025

Mohd. Tahir Hussain versus State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-22-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.911

[2025] 1 S.C.R. 911 : 2025 INSC 100 Mohd. Tahir Hussain v. State of NCT of Delhi (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 856 of 2025) 22 January 2025 [Pankaj Mithal* and Ahsanuddin Amanullah,* JJ.] Issue for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2002

Ravindra Mohan Swarup Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer/City Magis ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-23-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12 and 14

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2048

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned standing counsel representing the respondent-State.2. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1999

Kanchchid Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-29-1999

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2(2), 4(1), 12(2), 18 and 18(1) and (2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC1978

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Mithal, Adv.

Binod Kumar Roy and Onkareshwar Bhatt, JJ.1. Whether inthe peculiar facts and circumstances of the instant case, the Collector was justified in rejecting the petitioner's application filed under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial