Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: pal · Page 1 of about 27,617 results (0.382 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 14 2007

Ram Pal and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-14-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 107, 116, 149 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1395; JT2008(1)SC11; 2007(14)SCALE394; 2008AIRSCW101; 2008(1)AICLR471; 2008(1)LH(SC)1; 2008(3)KCCRSN227

Advocate for Appellant : Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv.,; Rakesh Dahiya,; Nikhil Jain,;

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.1. This appeal by special leave arises out of the following facts.2. One Lal Singh had three sons, Hari Singh, Jaswant Singh and Birbal Singh. Brij Pal Singh PW 1, Ved Pal and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2003

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-12-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]133TAXMAN491(Orissa)

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Pal, for the Assessee Mrs. Agrawal, for the Revenue

Heard Dr. Pal, leaned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mrs. Agrawal, leaned senior standing counsel (Central) for the Union of India.2. Issue usual notice to the opposite parties on the question of admission. Notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1989

Rajindernath Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-1989

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 39(1989)DLT238

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Bhasin,; Sonia Afehta,; Sat Pal,;

Leila Seth, J.(1) By this writ petition the pethioner is praying for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as a Brigadier with original seniority and permit him to continue to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 26 1999

Usha Beltron Ltd. and anr. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax and or ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-26-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148

Advocate for Appellant : Debi Pal and M.S. Mittal, Advs.

1. After having heard learned counsel for the parties and going through the pleadings filed on their behalf, this writ application is being disposed of at the admission stage itself, The petitioners challenged the notice, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1978

Renusagar Power Company Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, 'A' Ward and Anr. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148

Reported in : [1979]117ITR719(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Pal, ;Bharatji Agarwal and ;A.N. Mahajan, Advs.

K.C. Agrawal, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the notice dated March 12, 1976, issued under Section 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1997

Brooke Bond India Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal- ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 and 261

Reported in : AIR1997SC1336; (1997)140CTR(SC)598; [1997]225ITR798(SC); JT1997(3)SC375; 1997(2)SCALE448; (1997)10SCC362; [1997]2SCR524

Advocate for Appellant : Debi Pal,; S. Ganesh,; Rahul P. Dave,;Shipra Ghos

1. In this appeal, by certificate granted by the High Court under Section 261 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the following question referred to the Calcutta High Court by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2015

Vijay Pal Vs. State(Govt. of Nctof Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2015

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1653/2014 % Judgment delivered on 05 February, 2015 VIJAY PAL .....APPELLANT Through : Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nagendra Kasana, Advocate Versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2004

Ram Kumar and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-24-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2015

Advocate for Appellant : Shankar Sharma and ;Jai Pal Singh, Advs.

1. These two appellants have been convicted under Section 302/34 of I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life, for committing murder of Kanhaiya Lal Rastogi on 20-5-1978 at about 9.15 p.m. within the limits of Mohalla...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2003

Smt. Ranjana Paul Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-21-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 13, 397(3) and 482

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1505

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Pal, Adv.

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. In the instant application the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the Judgment/order dated 14-8-2002 passed by the 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in Cr. Rev. No. 521 of 1998 filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1974

Balaram Bhoi and anr. Vs. Malati Bewa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-12-1974

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144

Reported in : AIR1975Ori12

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Pal, Adv.

B.K. Patra, Ag. C.J. 1. The short and important point that arises for determination in this second appeal is whether Article 142 or Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908 applies to the facts of this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial