Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p valliappan · Page 1 of about 121 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 12 2007

L. Bakthavatsalam and ors. Vs. R. Alagiriswamy (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-12-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30 and 63; Central Act, 1986; Indian Succession Act, 1956; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63, 65, 68, 69, 71 and 80; Specific Relief Act - Sections 34; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 58 and 60; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3, 14, 15 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145; Central Act, 1986; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : 2007(5)CTC513; (2007)6MLJ128

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Rajagopalan, Sr. Adv. for; Chitra Sampath, Adv. in SA. Nos. 314 and 315 of 1994,; R. Muthukumaraswamy, Sr. Adv. for; B. Raviraja, Adv. in SA. Nos. 41 and 42 of 1997 and; P. Valliappan, Adv. in SA

P. Jyothimani, J.1. Nearly 93 items of properties which include immovable properties situated in Uppilipalayam Village, Kalapatti Village, Singanallur Village, Vellakinaru Village and Kurudampalayam Village, all at Coimbatore District, originally belonged to one R. Venkitusamy Naidu,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2000

B.M.A. Najira Begum Vs. A.M.S. Kassim

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-24-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 10(2); Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973

Reported in : 2000(4)CTC474; (2001)1MLJ37

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Valliappan, Adv.

ORDERl. Heard Mr.P.Valliappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vasudhevan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. Thelandlady of a premises situated in Kumbakonam is the revision petitioner in this Court. She filed R.C.O.P.No.11 of 1994...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2002

M. Ravi Vs. R. Vasanthakumari

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-03-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ679

Advocate for Appellant : P. Valliappan, Adv. for ;Sarvabhauman Associates

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This appeal is filed against the order dated 10.6.2002 in I.A.No.466 of 2002 in O.S.No.256 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Karur. 2. The respondent herein instituted the suit in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 08 2012

Hindustan Corporation (Hyd) Private Ltd. Vs. M/S. Ssb Industries Limit ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2013(1)LW40; 2013(1)CTC279

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: P. Valliappan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Nageswaran & Narichania, Advocates.

(Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree of the Second Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 20.07.2006 in A.S.No.704 of 2005 confirming the judgment and decree of the Assistant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2006

C. Jayanthi Vs. the Commissioner Mettur Municipality and Eswari

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ128

Advocate for Appellant : P. Valliappan, Adv. for ;Anna Gandhi, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2010

V. Lakshmi, Vs. the District Collector,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-2010

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 4(1), 5 and 17

Advocate for Appellant : AR. L. Sundaresan, SC for; P. Valliappan, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard both sides. The three petitioners herein have filed the present writ petition seeking for writ in the nature of mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2012

Lakshmiammal and Others Vs. Nagammal and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-02-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(3)MWN(Civil)664; 2012(8)MLJ707; 2013(1)CTC207

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: P. Valliappan, Advocate. For the Respondents: D. Rajagopal, Advocate.

(Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree of the II Additional Subordinate Judge's Court at Coimbatore, dated 09.04.2008 in A.S.No.54 of 2007 reversing the Judgement and decree of the III...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2012

S. Karuppannan and Another Vs. N. Chinnappan and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-16-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: P. Valliappan, Advocate. For the Respondents: -------.

Plaintiffs are the revision petitioners. 2. The plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration and other reliefs. Defendants 1, 2, 5 and 6 filed I.A.No.1005 of 2009 for interim injunction as if the second defendant purchased the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2007

inbamathi Vs. Ramar,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 63 and 64; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 108

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC116

Advocate for Appellant : P. Valliappan, Adv.

K. Mohan Ram, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S. No. 625 of 1992 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Virudhachalam, who has lost before the Courts below has filed the above second appeal.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2011

Thangeswari and ors. Vs. Thirumalvalavan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 97

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.Valliappan, Adv.

1. The appellants herein are the obstructors, who filed the suit in O.S.No.506 of 1992.2. The facts which are necessary for the disposal of this Second Appeal are as follows:-i) The respondents 1 to 5 herein...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial