Advanced Search Results
Emaar Mgf Construction Pvt Ltd Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors
Delhi
Dec-20-2010
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 31; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 41(b)
Mr. P.V. Kapur; Mr. Sunil Goel; Dheeraj Singh; Sushil Bhartiya; Aman Anand; Pranav Sapra, Advs.
1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to seek an interim order of injunction against the respondent no.1, DDA to stay the effect and operation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFocus Brands Trading (India) Pvt Ltd and anr.Vs Campari International ...
Delhi
Aug-20-2010
Arbitration
Mr P V Kapur, Sr , Ms Ritu Bhalla, Mr Dhruv Dewan, Mr Aman, Ms Ananya Ghosh. Advs.
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes2. To be referred to Reporters or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest ?ORDER. (under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFocus Brands Trading (India) Pvt Ltd and anr. Vs Campari International ...
Delhi
Aug-20-2010
Arbitration
Mr. P V Kapur, Sr, Ms Ritu Bhalla, Mr Dhruv Dewan, Mr Aman, Ms Ananya Ghosh. Advs.
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes2. To be referred to Reporters or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest ?ORDER. (under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kuldip Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Mar-12-1993
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
1993(25)DRJ490; (1993)IILLJ422Del
P.V. Kapur,; Navin Prakash,; Salil Paul,;
D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) Services of the petitioner who was working as Chief Executive (Corporate Affairs) in Swadeshi Polytex Limited (respondent No.2), a public limited company, were terminated by order dated20June 1991 of the third respondent- Chairman...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurjit Singh and anr. Vs. Kumar Pahilaj and ors.
Delhi
Apr-21-2006
Tenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 111; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 39, Rule 10 - Order 41, Rule 5
129(2006)DLT572; 2006(88)DRJ693
P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv.,; Pramod Kumar Dubey, Adv. for petitioner No. 1,;
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, this civil revision petition is taken up for final hearing.2. This civil revision petition has been preferred against the order of the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaveen Chand and anr. Vs. Nagarjuna Travels and Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-30-2002
Tenancy
Andhra Pradesh Building, Lease, Rent and Eviction Control Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106
AIR2002SC2870; 2002(5)ALD23(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)255; 2002(5)ALT1(SC); JT2002(6)SC70; (2002)3MLJ176(SC); RLW2002(4)SC600; 2002(5)SCALE482; (2002)6SCC331; 2002(2)LC1161(SC)
P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv.,; Krishna Kumar and; Jeevesh Nagrath
D.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal, filed by the defendants of O.S. No. 778 of 1996 on the file of the City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is directed against the judgment of the High Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Aggarwal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi
Mar-18-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 22, 139, 143(1), (2) and (3), 147 and 148; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16, 16(2) and 17;
(1997)142CTR(Del)272; [1997]225ITR496(Delhi)
P.V. Kapur and; Anurag Chawla, Advs
D.K. Jain, J. 1. Two of the writ petitions, taken up herein, involve the provisions of the IT Act, 1961, and the other two involve the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (for short, 'the WT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPaharpur 3p (a Division of Paharpur Cooling Towers Limited) Vs. Dalmia ...
Delhi
Jul-02-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439; Income Tax Act; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9
(2008)3CompLJ554(Del); 2008(105)DRJ236; [2008]88SCL298(Delhi)
P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv.,; Amit Prasad and; Chandra Shekhar
Vipin Sanghi, J.1. The petitioner seeks the winding up of the respondent company by invoking Sections 433(e), 434 & 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter called the 'Act') on the ground that the respondent is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.R.C. Cement Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financia ...
Delhi
Sep-23-1997
SICACompany
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 18, 19 and 20
1997VIAD(Delhi)135; AIR1998Delhi359; [1999]97CompCas459(Delhi); 71(1998)DLT213; 1997(43)DRJ377
P.V.Kapur,; L.K. Garg,; Arun Jaitley,;
A.P. Mishra, C.J.(1) The petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 2.5.1996 passed in appeal by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as AAIFR), and the order dated 27.4.1995 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Jagatjit Jaiswal and anr. Vs. Karmajit Singh Jaiswal and anr.
Delhi
Nov-14-2007
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 11 and 16; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Evidence Act - Sections 20; Arbitration Rules - Rule 1; ICC Rules
2007(4)ARBLR300(Delhi); 146(2008)DLT404; 2007(99)DRJ641
P.V. Kapur and; Shyam Divan, Sr. Advs.,; Asim Vachher a
Vipin Sanghi, J.1. In this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (referred to as 'the Act' hereinafter), the preliminary objection raised by the respondents before me that needs to be determined...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »