Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p v kapur · Page 1 of about 128 results (0.128 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 20 2010

Emaar Mgf Construction Pvt Ltd Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-2010

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 31; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 41(b)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.V. Kapur; Mr. Sunil Goel; Dheeraj Singh; Sushil Bhartiya; Aman Anand; Pranav Sapra, Advs.

1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to seek an interim order of injunction against the respondent no.1, DDA to stay the effect and operation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2010

Focus Brands Trading (India) Pvt Ltd and anr.Vs Campari International ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-20-2010

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr P V Kapur, Sr , Ms Ritu Bhalla, Mr Dhruv Dewan, Mr Aman, Ms Ananya Ghosh. Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes2. To be referred to Reporters or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest ?ORDER. (under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2010

Focus Brands Trading (India) Pvt Ltd and anr. Vs Campari International ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-20-2010

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P V Kapur, Sr, Ms Ritu Bhalla, Mr Dhruv Dewan, Mr Aman, Ms Ananya Ghosh. Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes2. To be referred to Reporters or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest ?ORDER. (under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 12 1993

Kuldip Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-1993

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ490; (1993)IILLJ422Del

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Kapur,; Navin Prakash,; Salil Paul,;

D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) Services of the petitioner who was working as Chief Executive (Corporate Affairs) in Swadeshi Polytex Limited (respondent No.2), a public limited company, were terminated by order dated20June 1991 of the third respondent- Chairman...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2006

Surjit Singh and anr. Vs. Kumar Pahilaj and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 111; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 39, Rule 10 - Order 41, Rule 5

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT572; 2006(88)DRJ693

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv.,; Pramod Kumar Dubey, Adv. for petitioner No. 1,;

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, this civil revision petition is taken up for final hearing.2. This civil revision petition has been preferred against the order of the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2002

Naveen Chand and anr. Vs. Nagarjuna Travels and Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-30-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Building, Lease, Rent and Eviction Control Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR2002SC2870; 2002(5)ALD23(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)255; 2002(5)ALT1(SC); JT2002(6)SC70; (2002)3MLJ176(SC); RLW2002(4)SC600; 2002(5)SCALE482; (2002)6SCC331; 2002(2)LC1161(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv.,; Krishna Kumar and; Jeevesh Nagrath

D.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal, filed by the defendants of O.S. No. 778 of 1996 on the file of the City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is directed against the judgment of the High Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1996

Rakesh Aggarwal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 22, 139, 143(1), (2) and (3), 147 and 148; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16, 16(2) and 17;

Reported in : (1997)142CTR(Del)272; [1997]225ITR496(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Kapur and; Anurag Chawla, Advs

D.K. Jain, J. 1. Two of the writ petitions, taken up herein, involve the provisions of the IT Act, 1961, and the other two involve the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (for short, 'the WT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2008

Paharpur 3p (a Division of Paharpur Cooling Towers Limited) Vs. Dalmia ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439; Income Tax Act; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : (2008)3CompLJ554(Del); 2008(105)DRJ236; [2008]88SCL298(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv.,; Amit Prasad and; Chandra Shekhar

Vipin Sanghi, J.1. The petitioner seeks the winding up of the respondent company by invoking Sections 433(e), 434 & 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter called the 'Act') on the ground that the respondent is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 1997

A.R.C. Cement Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financia ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-1997

Subject : SICACompany

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 18, 19 and 20

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)135; AIR1998Delhi359; [1999]97CompCas459(Delhi); 71(1998)DLT213; 1997(43)DRJ377

Advocate for Appellant : P.V.Kapur,; L.K. Garg,; Arun Jaitley,;

A.P. Mishra, C.J.(1) The petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 2.5.1996 passed in appeal by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as AAIFR), and the order dated 27.4.1995 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2007

Sh. Jagatjit Jaiswal and anr. Vs. Karmajit Singh Jaiswal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-14-2007

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 11 and 16; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Evidence Act - Sections 20; Arbitration Rules - Rule 1; ICC Rules

Reported in : 2007(4)ARBLR300(Delhi); 146(2008)DLT404; 2007(99)DRJ641

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Kapur and; Shyam Divan, Sr. Advs.,; Asim Vachher a

Vipin Sanghi, J.1. In this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (referred to as 'the Act' hereinafter), the preliminary objection raised by the respondents before me that needs to be determined...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial