Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p v bakthavatsalam · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.068 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 05 1994

Govindan Alias Sadayan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-1994

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1904

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Bakthavatsalam, Adv.

Arunachalam, J.1. Both these habeas corpus petitions are disposed of together by a common order, since detenu concerned in each one of these petitions are stated to be involved in the same ground crime and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2000

Ezhumbur Railadi Salaiyora Sirukadai Viyabarigal Sangam Reg No. 6/97, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 226

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC280

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.V. Bakthvatsalam, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner association has filed this writ petition seeking for the issue of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to regularise the road side vending of 81 members of petitioner sangam, the list of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2004

Management of Secales Limited, Rep. by General Manager (Operations) Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-08-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR482]; (2004)IIILLJ160Mad; (2004)2MLJ631

Advocate for Appellant : Karthick, Adv. for ;T.S. Gopalan & Co. in W.P. No. 13341/1997, ; P.V. Bakthavatsalam, Adv. in W.P. No. 12877/1998

ORDERPrabha Sridevan, J.1. The writ petitioner in W.P. No. 13341 of 1997 devised a training scheme whereby candidates were selected as apprentices and given training for three semesters. The training includes, on the job training and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 11 1994

K.R. Krishnan Vs. P. Shanmugam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-11-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 19

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas608(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Bakthavatsalam, Adv.

Thanikkachalam, J. 1. The plaintiff is the petitioner herein. The plaintiff filed the suit on a promissory note dated August 15, 1990, to recover a sum of Rs. 18,375. Before numbering the suit, it was posted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial