Advanced Search Results
Madhav Jha & Anr. Vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Nov-30-2018
Land Acquisition
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 367/2018 MADHAV JHA & ANR versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantosh Kumar Vs. Deputy Collector (Up-ziladhikari) Deoria and Others
Allahabad
May-11-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
2000(3)AWC1986; (2000)2UPLBEC1499
H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.
Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ. 1. The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, has come up with a prayer to quash the order dated 10th March. 2000, passed by the Deputy Collector (Up-Ziladhikari), District Deoria. respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJugal Kishore and Others Vs. State of U.P., Through Collector, Padraun ...
Allahabad
Jul-11-1997
Property
Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 11, 11(1) and (2), 12, 13, 14, 14(1) and 15(1)
1998(1)AWC86
H.S.N. Tripathi, ;P.S. Tripathi and ;S.K. Pandey, Advs.
R.H. Zaidi, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel and also perused the record of the case.2. By means of this petition, petitioners pray for a writ order or direction in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hakim Singh Vs. Ram Sanehi and Others
Allahabad
Mar-16-2001
Contract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 20; T.P. Act - Sections 53A
2001(2)AWC1118
H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.
B. K. Rathi, J.1. Both of these appeals arise out of common Judgment and decree, dated 20.11.1997 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge. Agra. These appeals Involve the same questions of facts and law and, therefore,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheo Kumar Son of Lalu Prajapati Vs. Board of Revenue U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-18-2005
CivilProperty
Land Revenue Act - Sections 33 and 39; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 198
2005(3)AWC2444
H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.
Arun Tondon, J.1. Heard Sri H.S.N. Tripathi Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Vimlesh Kumar Advocate on behalf of respondents Nos. 3 to 6 and 10 to 14 and Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshav Prasad Tiwari Vs. Marwari Intermediate College Alias Maharaja A ...
Allahabad
Aug-27-2002
Service
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11
2002(4)AWC3199
K.C. Saksena, ;Subhash Chandra, ;H.S.N. Tripathi, ;P.S. Tripathi, ;Aditya Prasad Tiwari, ;T.N. Tiwari and ;R.S. Mishra, Advs.
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29th March, 1976, passed by the IIIrd Additional District Judge, Deoria in Civil Appeal No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Krishna Yadav and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-10-2000
Constitution
All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 23
(2000)3UPLBEC2117
H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.
I.M. Quddusi, J.1. This writ petition has been heard alongwith similar other writ petitions but since the course for which the petitioners of this writ petition had applied are different, they are being disposed of separately,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSabhajeet Pandey Son of Late Sri Dwarika Prasad Pandey Manager, Commit ...
Allahabad
Aug-18-2006
Service
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulations 2, 104 and 105
2006(4)AWC3614
H.S.N. Tripathi, ;P.S. Tripathi and ;Pankaj Tripathi, Advs.
D.P. Singh, J.1. All these petitions raise common questions on somewhat similar facts and, therefore, on the request of the parties, they are being decided by a common order.2. Only those facts which run through the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Bhajan Son of Tirath, Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Through Collector ...
Allahabad
Aug-12-2005
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Uttar Pradesh Collection Amins Service Rules, 1974 - Rules 5, 5(1), 6 and 17A; Uttar Pradesh Collection Amins Service (Amendment) Rules, 1992
2006(1)AWC627
H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.
A.P. Sahi, J.1. The petitioners, who were seasonal collection amins, have challenged the order dated 30.6.2000 passed by the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur and have prayed for quashing of the same] with a further direction to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Prakash Vs. A.D.J., (Court No. 9) and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-30-2004
Tenancy
Limitation Act - Sections 5; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rules 24 and 25; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 2(2), 16, 18, 19, 21(1) and 24(2)
2005(1)ARC95; 2005(1)AWC978
P.S. Tripathi, ;H.S.N. Tripathi, ;T.P. Singh and ;Himanshu Srivastava, Advs.
Anjani Kumar, J.1. Since these two writ petitions have arisen out of same set of facts, therefore they are being disposed of by this common judgment. In, short, the facts of the case are that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »