Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p s tripathi · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.104 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 30 2018

Madhav Jha & Anr. Vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-30-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 367/2018 MADHAV JHA & ANR versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2000

Santosh Kumar Vs. Deputy Collector (Up-ziladhikari) Deoria and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-11-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC1986; (2000)2UPLBEC1499

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.

Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ. 1. The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, has come up with a prayer to quash the order dated 10th March. 2000, passed by the Deputy Collector (Up-Ziladhikari), District Deoria. respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1997

Jugal Kishore and Others Vs. State of U.P., Through Collector, Padraun ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-11-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 11, 11(1) and (2), 12, 13, 14, 14(1) and 15(1)

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC86

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi, ;P.S. Tripathi and ;S.K. Pandey, Advs.

R.H. Zaidi, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel and also perused the record of the case.2. By means of this petition, petitioners pray for a writ order or direction in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 16 2001

Hakim Singh Vs. Ram Sanehi and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-16-2001

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 20; T.P. Act - Sections 53A

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1118

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.

B. K. Rathi, J.1. Both of these appeals arise out of common Judgment and decree, dated 20.11.1997 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge. Agra. These appeals Involve the same questions of facts and law and, therefore,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2005

Sheo Kumar Son of Lalu Prajapati Vs. Board of Revenue U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-18-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Land Revenue Act - Sections 33 and 39; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 198

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2444

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.

Arun Tondon, J.1. Heard Sri H.S.N. Tripathi Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Vimlesh Kumar Advocate on behalf of respondents Nos. 3 to 6 and 10 to 14 and Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2002

Keshav Prasad Tiwari Vs. Marwari Intermediate College Alias Maharaja A ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-27-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC3199

Advocate for Appellant : K.C. Saksena, ;Subhash Chandra, ;H.S.N. Tripathi, ;P.S. Tripathi, ;Aditya Prasad Tiwari, ;T.N. Tiwari and ;R.S. Mishra, Advs.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29th March, 1976, passed by the IIIrd Additional District Judge, Deoria in Civil Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2000

Rajendra Krishna Yadav and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-10-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 23

Reported in : (2000)3UPLBEC2117

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.

I.M. Quddusi, J.1. This writ petition has been heard alongwith similar other writ petitions but since the course for which the petitioners of this writ petition had applied are different, they are being disposed of separately,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2006

Sabhajeet Pandey Son of Late Sri Dwarika Prasad Pandey Manager, Commit ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-18-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulations 2, 104 and 105

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3614

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi, ;P.S. Tripathi and ;Pankaj Tripathi, Advs.

D.P. Singh, J.1. All these petitions raise common questions on somewhat similar facts and, therefore, on the request of the parties, they are being decided by a common order.2. Only those facts which run through the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2005

Ram Bhajan Son of Tirath, Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Through Collector ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-12-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Uttar Pradesh Collection Amins Service Rules, 1974 - Rules 5, 5(1), 6 and 17A; Uttar Pradesh Collection Amins Service (Amendment) Rules, 1992

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC627

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi and ;P.S. Tripathi, Advs.

A.P. Sahi, J.1. The petitioners, who were seasonal collection amins, have challenged the order dated 30.6.2000 passed by the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur and have prayed for quashing of the same] with a further direction to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2004

Om Prakash Vs. A.D.J., (Court No. 9) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rules 24 and 25; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 2(2), 16, 18, 19, 21(1) and 24(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC95; 2005(1)AWC978

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Tripathi, ;H.S.N. Tripathi, ;T.P. Singh and ;Himanshu Srivastava, Advs.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. Since these two writ petitions have arisen out of same set of facts, therefore they are being disposed of by this common judgment. In, short, the facts of the case are that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial