Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p s raman · Page 1 of about 325 results (0.266 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 10 2012

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd., and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-2012

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: A.L. Somayaji, T.V. Ramanujan, Senior Counsels, A. Mohan Advocates. For the Respondents: P.S. Raman Senior Counsel, R1 and R5, Poovayya, R2, Vineeth Subramani, R3, Sathish Parasaran, R4, V. Niranjan, Prashant Rajagopal, Advocate.

(Prayer: Original Second Appeals filed against the common order dated 30.09.2010 made in O.A.Nos.977 and 978 in C.S.No.832 of 2009 on the Original Side of this Court.) M. Duraiswamy, J. 1. The appellant in both the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2005

Zee Telefilms Limited Represented by Its Executive Vice President-lega ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(2)CTC525; (2005)2MLJ281

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve and ;P.S. Raman, Sr. Advs., ;Maninder Singh and ;Pratibha Singh, Advs. for ;P.R. Raman, Adv.

ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. The petitioner, Zee Telefilms Limited, prays for a Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the first respondent in its communication dated 21.9.2004 cancelling the tender process dated 7.8.2004 and to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2010

M/S.Sumangala Steels Limited, and ors. Vs. Government of the Union Ter ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-21-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman,Sr.Counsel; Mr.D.Sreenivasan, Advs.

1. Aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge in W.P.No.15702 of 1997 dated 5.1.2001 in allowing the Writ Petition holding that the Writ Petitioner M/s.Sumangala Steels Limited is entitled to the benefits of subsidy...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2009

Tci Distribution Centres Ltd. Rep. by Its Authorised Signatory Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 455 and 460(6); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 90 to 92; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas437(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raman, Sr. Counsel for S.R. Rajagopal, Adv.

M. Chockalingam, J.1. All these appeals challenge a common order of the learned single Judge of this Court dated 13.04.2009 made in C.A. No. 1953 to 1956 of 2008 in C.A. No. 1983 of 2007 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2012

Vijayakant. Vs. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-26-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 121, 226, 219 to 230, 117, 120, 122, 121 (2), 121(1), 229 (d), 227(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 212 (1), 194(3), 105(3) , 20, 21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman, S.C. Adv.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Declaration declaring the impugned resolution dated 02.02.2012 passed in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, which was communicated to the petitioner in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2006

Fountainhead Communications Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 27(1), 44AB, 226(3), 269(SS), 271(D) and 273(B); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Mad)415; [2006]285ITR36(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raman, Adv. for ;Sivanandraj, Adv.

K. Mohan Ram, J. 1. Ms. Pushya Seetharaman, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondents. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2008

Corporation of Chennai Rep. by Its Commissioner Vs. D. Kuppan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-04-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2008)3MLJ394

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raman, Additional Adv. General assisted by ;P. Bhagyalakshmi, Standing Counsel

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The Corporation of Chennai (for brevity, 'the Corporation') has filed these appeals against the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 26.3.2005 made in W.P. No. 6683 to 6701, 6748, 8157 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2008

Mariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-30-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 23 and 53; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 12, 13(4), 43, 45(1), 48, 53, 104 and 108; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 11 and 26(1); Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Copyright Act, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2008(5)CTC97; LC2008(3)431; (2008)6MLJ1117; 2008(38)PTC341(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P Datar Sr. Counsel for ;Sivam Sivanandaraj, Adv. in O.S.A. No. 263 of 2006, ;P.S. Raman, Sr. Counsel in O.S.A. 283 of 2006

M. Sathyanarayanan, J.1. The orders passed herein will govern the disposal of O.S.A. Nos. 263 and 283 of 2006.For the sake of convenience, the array of parties as referred in C.S. No. 448 of 2006, is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2009

Tvs Motor Company Limited Vs. Bajaj Auto Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-18-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3, 8, 9, 10(4), 11, 11A, 11A(7), 12, 13, 13(4), 25, 43, 45, 47, 48, 48(2), 57, 64, 64(1), 104, 104A, 104A(1), 107 and 107(1); Designs Act - Sections 51A and 53

Reported in : LC2009(2)139; 2009(40)PTC689(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : A.L. Somayaji, Adv. and P.S. Raman, Sr. Counsel for T.K. Bhaskar, Adv.

F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. O.S.A. No. 91 of 2008 has been filed by the Appellant as against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.02.2008, passed in O.A. No. 1272 of 2007 in C.S. No. 979 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2007

Sun Tv Limited Vs. Tata Sky Limited and the Telecom Disputes Appellate ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-05-2007

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : India Telecom Regulatory Authority Act, 1997 - Sections 14 and 15; ;Telecom Interconnection Regulation Act, 2004; Original Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 - Sections 28; Constitution of Indian - Articles 226, 227, 323A and 323B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : (2007)5MLJ277

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raman, Sr. Adv. for ; P. Wilson, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. While W.P. No. 12827 of 2007 has been filed challenging the order dated 19.03.2007 passed by the second respondent in Petition No. 291 (C) of 2006 and to quash the same, W.P. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial