Advanced Search Results

Tarsem & Anr vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vikram Singh

$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2078/2017 TARSEM & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI...

Sheel Utpal and ors. Vs. Hari Chand

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1979Delhi197; 16(1979)DLT1; 1979RLR345

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Mahendra and; G.L. Seth, Advs

M.L. Jain, J.(1) Tenant Brij Mohan died on April 7, 1972? leaving behind the respondents, namely? his widow Sheel Utpal, and four sons, who succeeded to the tenancy rights. An eviction petition was filed on April...

K.C. Gehani Vs. Parvati Devi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : 1978RLR68

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Mahendra, Adv

Rajindar Sachar, J. (1) This order will dispose of C. Rs. 286 and 559 of 1977. An application for eviction was filed by the respondent landlady seeking eviction as the premises were required on the ground...

Lalita Gupta Vs. Surinder Kumar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT730; 1995RLR558

Advocate for Appellant : I.S. Mathur,; Tarun John,; P.S. Mahendra and;

Arun Kumar, J.(1) The appellant filed the present eviction petition against respondent No. I on 29.3.1982 on the ground contained in Clause (k) to the proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent...

Sunil @ Raghu vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Mr. Harsh Singhal, Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Mr. Aditya Vikram, Mr. Avinash

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 997/2015 Reserved on:6. h February, 2018 Decided on:26. h February, 2018 SUNIL @ RAGHU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with...

Fahim vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Mr. Harsh Singhal, Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Mr. Aditya Vikram, Mr. Avinash

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 997/2015 Reserved on:6. h February, 2018 Decided on:26. h February, 2018 SUNIL @ RAGHU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with...

Wazir Chand Karam Chand Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 4 and 30

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi175; 1989(1)ARBLR187(Delhi); 37(1989)DLT164

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatagi,; A.S. Gambhir and; P.S.Mahendra, Advs

Mahesh Chandra, J.(1) By this judgment I propose to dispose of suit No. 1706Aofl984 filed under sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and objections incorporated in I.A. No. 953 of 1986 filed under...

Murari Lal Verma Vs. Nanak Chand

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 23(1983)DLT195; 1983(4)DRJ30

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Mahendra,; S.N. Gupta,; S.K. Gupta and;

Sultan Singh, J.(1) In this second appeal under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'), the appellant- tenant challenges the judgment and order of the Rent Control Tribunal, dated...

Raghunandan Saran Ashok Saran Vs. Amrit Lal Chopra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 13, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1986Delhi301; 29(1986)DLT430; 1986(10)DRJ1

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Mahendra, Adv

J.D. Jain, J. (1) The facts giving rise to this revision petition which is directed against order dated 9th February 1979 of a Sub-Judge 1st Class. Delhi, succinctly are that way back in 1977 the petitioner,...

Bengal Silk Trading Co. Vs. D.S. Bhalla

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997IAD(Delhi)298; 65(1997)DLT219; 1997(40)DRJ254; 1997RLR66

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Sood and; P.S. Mahendra, Advs

R.C. Lahoti, J. (1) This is a decree holder's revision feeling aggrieved by an order dated 15.5.87 passed by a executing court directing appropriation of payment made by the judgment debtor as against a decree for...