Advanced Search Results

Vinith Zacharia Joshy, vs Mariam Elizabeth Alexander@Anju,

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 23RD MAGHA,1942 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OPDIV 418/2016 DATED...

Delhi Development Authority Vs. M/S Satish Steel Traders and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.325/2014 Decided on :2. d February,2015 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Arun Birbal, Adv. versus M/S SATISH STEEL TRADERS AND ORS. Through: ........

Narayan Maruti Vs. District Judge, Kolaba and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 12, 13, 13A, 15, 15(1), 15(1A), 15(1B), 15(2), 15(3), 18, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3) and 22(4); Bombay District Municipal Election Rules, 1950 - Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1953Bom288; (1953)55BOMLR314; ILR1953Bom942

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Joshi, Adv.

Chagla, C.J. (1) A very interesting question arises on this petition as to the law of election applicable to the District Municipal elections. The petitioner is a Harijan and he and opponent 2 offered themselves as...

Narmadabai Narayanshet Shet Vs. Hidayatalli Saheballi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationCivil

Reported in : (1948)50BOMLR696

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the surety against the order passed by the learned District Judge holding that the darkhast filed against the surety is in time and directing the Court of first...

Kumar Ram Nandan Vs. Fulid Power Private Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 12(5)

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ347Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.J. Kochar, Adv.

Kantharia, J.1. The petitioner was employed as a helper by the first respondent in the year 1965 on permanent basis. He was served with a charge-sheet dated 7th November, 1975 alleging that he threw away and...

D. Pandu Vs. General Manager, Central Warehousing Corporation and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 381 and 457; Administrative Law; Central Warehousing Corporation (Staff) Regulations, 1986 - Regulations 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 and 69; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD817; 2006(2)ALT614

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Sesha Sai, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. The question involved in both the writ petitions is as to whether acquittal in a criminal case, would preclude disciplinary action being initiated against an employee for the very same charges. Since common...

Maj. Gen. Surendra Kumar Sahni Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules - Rule 180

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)541; 105(2003)DLT211; 2003(71)DRJ693; 2004(1)SLJ80(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Shyamala Pappu, Sr. Adv. and; Jagmohan, Adv

B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. The petitioner is a Major General, in Army Service Corpse (ASC) of the Army. Presently, he is posted at Headquarters Southern Command, Pune, Maharashtra. Prior to that, he had been posted as Major...

Ranvir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT719; 1992RLR23

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Behl and; K.K. Menon, Advs

Bahri, J.(1) On 28th October, 1991, we have partly allowed the appeal. The reasons are. now being stated. (2) This appeal has been brought against judgment and decree dated February 12, 1985, of a Single Judge...

Brigadier B.C.Rana Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms.Jyoti Singh, Adv.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?1. This is a second round fought...

Mgi Coutier Exotech Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant : Shri M.P.S. Joshi, Advocate. For the Respondent : Shri D.D. Joshi, Superintendent (AR).

Ashok Jindal The appellants are in appeal along with stay applications against the impugned orders wherein differential duty has been demanded on the charge of undervaluation as they have not cleared goods by valuing the same...