Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p s jetly · Page 1 of about 137 results (0.100 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 21 2004

Dr. (Mrs) Sudha Kankariya Vs. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-21-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]136TAXMAN686(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Inamdar, for the Assessee R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue

J.P. Devadhar, J.The challenge in this petition is to the order passed by the Commissioner, Nasik, declining waiver of interest and penalties levied on the assessee under section 273A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2004

Mrs. Usha A. Kalwani Vs. S.N. Soni

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-22-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]136TAXMAN708(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.H. Patil and Satish Modi, for the Petitioner R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Respondent

V.C. Daga, J.This petition is directed against the order dated 3-11-1992 (Exhibit E) passed under section 273A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The facts leading to the present petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2002

Caprihans India Ltd. Vs. Prakash Chandra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-07-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)176CTR(Bom)173; [2002]122TAXMAN862(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Pardiwalla, for the Petitioner R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Respondent

J.P. Devadhar, J. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, rule is taken up for final hearing.2. In this petition, petitioner challenged the notice dated 31-1-2001 for reopening of the assessment issued under section 148...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 23 2003

Cit Vs. Major General Sir Shahaji Chatrapati

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-23-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]128TAXMAN45(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue V.H. Patil and Ms. Jyoti Diwan, for the Assessee

J.P. Devadhar, J.At the instance of the revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, viz. :'1. Whether income...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2002

Cit Vs. Sanjeev Woollen Mills

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]127TAXMAN209(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and R. Asokan, for the Revenue Ms. Shobha Jagatiani and Ms. Bina Pillai, for the Assessee.

S.H. Kapadia, J.Both the above appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are taken up together as they deal with common questions of law and facts. Appeal No. 9 of 2001 concerns assessment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2000

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kantilal Chhotalal

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-31-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)163CTR(Guj)476

Advocate for Appellant : R. V. Desai with P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue None, for the Assessee

S.H. Kapadia, J.The short point which arises for consideration in this appeal is : whether reassortment charges were includible in business profits while calculating export profits as per the formula : business profits X export turnover/total...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1999

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vas, J. N.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-20-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]106TAXMAN658(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for theRevenue None, for the Assessee

Desai, J.By this reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this court for opinion at the instance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Hindustan Cocoa Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(Bom)434

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry with Balkrishna i/b Crawford Bayley & Co., for the Assessee R.V. Desai with P.S Jetly, J.P. Devdhar i/b H.D. Rathod, for the Revenue

S.H. Kapadia, J.The following three questions have been referred to this court under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act for our opinion.'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2001

Ship Scrap Traders and ors. Vs. Cit and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-04-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(Bom)489

Advocate for Appellant : A.K Jasani with S.S. Shetty, K Shivram with K Gopal i/b Rustomji & Ginwala & M. Subramaniam with V.S. Khadade, for the Assessees R.V. Desai with P.S. Jetly & J.P. Deodhar i/b H.D.

V.C. Daga, J.IntroductionThe issue in the present batch of cases is one of some potential general significance relating to interpretation of the words 'manufactures or produces any articles or thing' in relation to the deduction under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2000

Cit Vs. Indian Hotels Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-19-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]119TAXMAN122(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and J. P. Deodhar, for the Revenue .P. J. Pardiwala and N.S. Joshi, for the Assessee

The assessee is a company. The assessee owns Taj Group of Hotels. In this reference we are concerned with the assessment year 1980-81 corresponding to the previous year ending 31-3-1980. The assessee paid remuneration to its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial