Advanced Search Results
Smt. Sudha Sharma Vs. Ram Naresh Jaiswal
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-28-1989
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24
AIR1990MP320; 1990MPLJ225
Fakhruddin, Adv.
ORDERB.M. Lal, J.1. This is claimant's application under Sec. 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of Misc. Judicial Case No. 11 of 1989 (arising out of Claim Case No. 6 of 1984 which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaya Gohiya W/O Prem Lal Gohiya Vs. Prem Lal Mangal Singh Gohiya
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-10-1989
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12, 13 and 13(1)
1990MPLJ362
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
ORDERB.M. Lal, J.1. This revision under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order dated 14-8-1986 passed by the IVth Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Sharma Vs. Smt. Neeta Sharma
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-11-1991
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11, 13 and 13(1)
I(1992)DMC222
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
K.M. Agarwal, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short, the 'Act') by the husband against dismissal of his petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Act.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vandana Sharma Vs. Ram Bihari Sharma
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-19-1988
FamilyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 13
I(1990)DMC443
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
K.K. Adhikari, J.1. This is a petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the applicant/wife Shrimati Vandana Sharma for transfer of Civil Suit No. 18-A of 88 (Vandana Sharma v. Rambihari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAndrias Soni Vs. Mr. Joyce Prasad Soni
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-26-1984
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 20
AIR1986MP180
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
C.P. Sen, J. 1. This is for confirmation of the decree for nullity of marriage under Section 19(4) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, which requires to be confirmed under Section 20 of the Act. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuneeta Vs. Rishabh Kumar Jain
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-11-1991
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9
I(1992)DMC255
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
K.M. Agarwal, J.1. Being aggrieved by dismissal of her petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (in short, the 'Act'), the wife has presented this appeal under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuneeta Vs. Rishab Kumar Jain
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-11-1991
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125
I(1992)DMC366
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
K.M. Aggarwal, J.1. Being aggrieved by dismissal of her petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (in short, the 'Act)', the wife has presented this appeal under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurendra Singh Chauhan Vs. Mamta Chouhan
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-10-1987
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1), 24, 25, 25(1), 26 and 28
II(1990)DMC208
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
Gulab C. Gupta, J.1. This is husband's appeal, filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30th April, 1984,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajaram Vishwakarma Vs. Deepabai
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-16-1973
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 12(1)
AIR1974MP52; 1973MPLJ626
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
Shiv Dayal, J. 1. This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred by the husband, whose marriage with the respondent (has been held to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaij Nath Rajput Vs. Narayan Prasad Gupta
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-06-1990
Tenancy
Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1), 23A, 23C, 23D, 23E and 23J; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control (Amendment) Act, 1985 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 15 - Order 5 - Order 6, Rules 14 and 15 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 41, Rule 27
AIR1991MP101; 1991(0)MPLJ241
P.S. Gothalwal, Adv.
B.C. Varma, J.1. The appellant-defendant is admittedly a tenant in certain premises of which the respondent-plaintiff is the owner-landlord. Desirous of exercising his right of reversion and to secure possession from the appellant, the respondent instituted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »