Advanced Search Results
Gangadhar Yeshwant Paranjape Vs. the Commissioner, Pune Municipal Corp ...
Mumbai
Mar-22-2004
Service
Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rule 63; Constitution of India - Article 14; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Reserve Bank of India Pension Regulations, 1990
2004(3)ALLMR38; 2004(4)BomCR68; [2004(102)FLR309]; 2004(2)MhLj919
Shobha Gopal, Adv.
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. This petition has been placed before us in view of Reference made by a Division Bench of this Court [Coram: B.P. Singh, C.J. (as His Lordship then was) and Hon'ble Smt. V.K. Tahilramani,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Ratnakar Bank Limited Vs. Usha Rajaram Nimbalkar and Others
Mumbai
May-10-2013
Land Acquisition
1 Rule, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2 The writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAman Harishkumar Vij Vs. Shantabai Anandrao Patil and Others
Mumbai
Apr-13-2015
Land Acquisition
1. Rule. With the consent of and at the request of the learned Counsels for the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. This petition challenges Order dated 28 October 2014 made by the 16th Joint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahesh Vishnupant Kothe Vs. Sanjay Channvirappa Hemgaddi and Others
Mumbai
Apr-13-2015
Land Acquisition
Shri. P.S. Dani
Oral Judgment: 1. Rule, with the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2. The Writ Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 02.03.2015 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMessrs Miscellenary Marketers Vs. Messrs Sun-N-Sand Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Jan-08-2016
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: 1. Admit, with the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties heard forthwith. 2. By way of the above Civil Revision Applications the applicants seek to invoke the Revisionary Jurisdiction of this Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPratap Balkrishna Kedari Vs. Premadevi Laxminarayan Agarwal
Mumbai
Nov-05-2001
Contract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182
2002(3)BomCR46
S.P. Kanuga, ;A.A. Irani and ;Rupali N. Kedari, Advs.
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Ms. Thadani appears for the respondent and points out that the respondent has received notice from the Registry of this Court dated September 29, 2001 which was served on him on October 30,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManilal Premji Gala of Bombay Indian inhabitant Vs. Boman P. Irani (si ...
Mumbai
Jan-21-2015
MRTP
Oral Judgment: 1. Admit. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties heard forthwith. 2. The Revisionary Jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the CPC is invoked against the order dated 19th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShre Chaitanya Constructions Vs. Sudhir Poonumchand Parakh
Supreme Court of India
Jul-17-2019
Education
Bharti Tyagi
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5620 OF2019(Arising out of SLP (C) No.30543 of 2018) SHREE CHAITANYA CONSTRUCTIONS Appellant(s) VERSUS SUDHIR POONAMCHAND PARAKH & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDasharath Bhaguji Jadhav and Others Vs. Kisan Bhaguji Jadhav and Other ...
Mumbai
Dec-13-2013
Land Acquisition
In the above Petition, Rule came to be issued on 29th October, 2013 and the above Petition was directed to be placed on 18th November, 2013 for hearing as to interim reliefs. The above Petition had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZahid Ahmedali Mazgaonwalla and Smt. ShahIn Zahid Mazgaonwalla Vs. Smt ...
Mumbai
Jul-11-2006
CivilTenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11) and 15; Muslim Law
2006(4)BomCR481; 2006(5)MhLj522
P.S. Dani, Adv.
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The Respondent is the paternal aunt of Appellant No. 1. Appellant No. 2 is the wife of Appellant No. 1. The suit premises was tenanted by the Appellant No. 1's grand father Pyarali...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »