Advanced Search Results

Dinanath Brahma Vs. Baleswar Shah and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1986 - Regulation 162(2)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Roy, Adv.

P. P. Naolekar, C.J.1. Heard Mr. P. Roy, learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondents.2. The facts in brief necessary for adjudication of the question involved in a case are set out herein...

Naku Lama Bhutia Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : India Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 222, 302 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 428, 432, 433, 433A and 484(2)

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2782

Advocate for Appellant : G.P. Roy, Amicus Curiae

Malay Sengupta, Actg. C.J.1. Though it has been registered as an Appeal, it starts with a representation sent by a convict from the jail for remission of his sentence.2. While admitting the appeal we called for...

Khargeswar Choudhury and anr. Vs. Isfaque HussaIn and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227 - Order 9, Rule 13

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.P. Roy and Mr. C. Baruah, Advs.

1. The factual matrix of this case depicts the callousness and lacklustre attitude on the part of a lawyer conducting in a case. A time has come when some authority must step in and take an...

Pratik Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pratap Properties Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act; ;Contempt of Courts Rules - Rules 4 and 17; ;Specific Relief Act - Sections 14(3)(C) and 42; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2008)3CALLT372(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Mitra, ;Joydip Kar, ;Aniruddha Chatterjee, ;A.K. Ghosh and ;Prabir Banerjee, Advs. in C.P.A.N. 1103 and 1265 of 2006 and C.A.N. 6267 of 2006 and ;S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Ashok Banerjee, ;J.L. Be, ;S

Pranab Kumar Deb, J.1. The dispute has a long chequered history. Genesis of the dispute between the land owner and the developer can be traced back to the mid eighties. M/s. Pratap Properties Ltd., being the...

Dulal Chandra Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Moni Mohan Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesFamily

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 6, 10, 122, 123, 126 and 197; ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 2(24); ;Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 5 and 6; ;Partition Act; ;Religious and Charitable Endowment Act; ;Hindu Sucession Act, 1956; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 16(3)

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN563

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Mrinal Kanti Roy and ;Kapil Chandra Sahoo, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. This appeal arises out of a judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Fifth Court at Alipore on June 12, 1978 in Title Suit No. 54 of 1974.1.2. This suit was...

Khargeswar Choudhury and anr. Vs. Isfaque HussaIn and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227 - Order 9, Rule 13

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.P. Roy and ;Mr. C. Baruah, Advs.

1. The factual matrix of this case depicts the callousness and lacklustre attitude on the part of a lawyer conducting in a case. A time has come when some authority must step in and take an...

Guru Prashad Chakraborty Vs. Tripura University and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Tripura University's First Ordinances, 1989 - Sections 9(2) and 3(19)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Roy Barman, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. The judgment and order dated 30.5.1997, passed in Civil Rule Nos. 2/1989 and 26/1989, dismissing the two writ petitions is under challenge in the present appeal.2. In a narrow compass, the facts, which...

Raghunath Choudhury and ors. Vs. Rameshwar Rai and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115, 115(1) and 151 - Orders 38, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy and N. Alam, Advs.

H.N. Sarma, J. 1. By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the order, dated 12.2.2003 passed in Misc (J) Case No. 1/03 arising out of Title Suit No....

Bholanath Karmakar and ors. Vs. Madanmohan Karmakar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 136 and 182; ;Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(15) and 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rules 6A and 7; ;Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR1988Cal1,(1988)1CALLT1(HC),92CWN428

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury, ;Kamal Krishna Chakraborty, ;Amit Kumar Rakshit and ;P.B. Das, Advs.

A.M. Bhattacharjee, J.1. The question involved in this revisional application referred to this Special Bench is when a final decree for partition becomes enforceable within the meaning of Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 so...

Jogesh Chandra Bera and ors. Vs. Sri Iswar Braja Raj Jew Thakur

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 33, Rule 1; ;Hindu Law; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3 (42)

Reported in : AIR1981Cal259,85CWN849

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Roy Chowdhury and ;Probhat Kumar Samanta, Advs.

B.C. Chakrabarti, J.1. This is a revision application at the instance of some of the defendants in a proceeding arising out of an application for leave to sue as indigent person being Judicial Misc. Case No....