Advanced Search Results

Assistant Collector of Customs Vs. Tey Teck Seng

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act ,1962 - Sections 110, 111, 112, 119, 123, 123(1), 124, 135(1) and 137(1)

Reported in : 1993(42)ECC93; 1992(61)ELT397(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri P. Rajamanickam, C.G.P.P.

1. The complainant, the Assistant Collector of Customs (Prosecution), Preventive Department, Customs House, Madras-1, is the appellant. Tey Teck Seng, a Chinese National, is the accused/respondent in this appeal. This appeal is filed under Section 378...

M/S. Thiru Muruga Finance Rep. by Its Partner Sri V. Thirunavukkarasu, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 - Sections 15; Constitution of India -- Articles 14, 19 (1)(G), 21, 246 and 254(2) -- Schedule VII; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Reserve Bank of India Act (amended), 1997; Tamil Nadu Act, 1997 -- Sections 45; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 -- Sections 5; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920; Companies Act, 1958 -- Sections 58A; State Bank of India (Subsidary Banks) Act, 1959; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 -- Sections 3; Industrial Development Bank of India Act, 1964 -- Sections 6A; Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 2; Hire-Purchase Act, 1972 -- Sections 2; Indain Partnership Act, 1932; Code of Cri

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC609

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C. Chinnasamy, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. P. Rajamanickam, ;Mr. Jeyakumar and ;Mr. S. Ramasamy, Advs., ;Mr. M. Palanichamy Party-in-person

ORDER1. All these writ petitions challenge the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act XIV of 1997). Hence, they are dealt with in a common...

Assistant Collector of Customs Vs. Paola Mortuzzi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 68

Reported in : 1989(20)ECC87; 1989(40)ELT306(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Thiru P. Rajamanickam, Central Government Prosecutor

ORDERThis petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Rajamanickam, Central Government Prosecutor on behalf of the petitioner and/or Mr....

The Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, 4(2), 43, 53, 54, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 167(3), 173, 437 and 482; Customs Act - Sections 103, 104, 104(2), 104(3), 135 and 138-B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173(4); Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 22(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Evidence Act - Sections 25; Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1956

Reported in : 1990CriLJ704

Advocate for Appellant : P. Rajamanickam, Central Govt. Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. Crl.M.P. No. 11117 of 1998 has been filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence seeking setting aside of the order of the Court of Session,...

Asstt. Collector of Central Excise, Customs, Tiruchirapalli Vs. Paul M ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3150

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Rajamanickam, Central Govt. Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. Paul M. A. Anthony, a Srilanka National, the respondent herein on 5-6-1990 at about 7-45 a.m. presented his baggage for Customs export examination at the Trichy airport for boarding Air Lanka Flight UL 132 bound...

Superintendent of Police, C.B.i. Vs. the Addl. Superintendent, Special ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987 - Sections 14(5)

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC13

Advocate for Appellant : P. Rajamanickam, Central Government Public Prosecutor

ORDERArunachalam, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of a learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing Writ Petition No. 18581 of 1994 preferred by the appellant herein, who had pleaded for issue of a...

Superintendent, Narcotics Control Bureau, South Zone, Madras Vs. Selva ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2143

Advocate for Appellant : P. Rajamanickam, Central Govt. Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. One S. Selvarajah, S/o. Thiru Selliah, aged 30 years, a Sri Lankan national was stated to be residing at No. 16, VI Street, Lakshmipuram, Thiruvanmiyur, Madras 41. He, it is said, has gained entry into...

Asstt. Collector of Customs Vs. Shanmugham

Court : Chennai

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439 and 439(2), 482 and 498

Reported in : 1988(15)ECC1; 1988(37)ELT201(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Rajamanickam, Central Government Prosecutor

Padmlni Jesudurai, J.1. Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to cancel the bail granted to the 1st respondent in Cri. M.P. No....

Assistant Collector of Central Excise Vs. Paul M.A. Anthony

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Narcotic Drug & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37

Reported in : 1991(34)ECC152; 1991LC527(Madras); 1991(53)ELT161(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Rajamanickam, Central Govt. Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. This petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Rajamanickam, Central Government Public Prosecutor on behalf of the petitioner and of Mr. K. J. Ayyappan, Advocate...

intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Arif U. Patel

Court : Chennai

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 1995(76)ELT28(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri P. Rajamanickam, Central Govt. Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. Crl. O.P. No. 6552/94 is filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of the bail granted to the respondent. The respondent was arrested and remanded before...