Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p peerya · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 08 2002

Dy. Cit Vs. Trab Enterprises

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Mumbai)1093

Advocate for Appellant : P. Peerya, for the Assessee Sanjeev Shah, for the Revenue

ORDERV.D. Wakharkar, A.M.:These two appeals by the revenue raise an identical ground. They are therefore, disposed of by a common order.2. Both the appeals raise the following ground :'On facts and in the circumstances of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2001

Nandlal Mukundlal Pittie Vs. Wto

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)75TTJ(Mumbai)603

Advocate for Appellant : Atul K. Jasani, for the Assessee P. Peerya, for the Revenue

Counsels: Atul K. Jasani, for the Assessee P. Peerya, for the RevenueCiting Reference: CIT v. Apsara Talkies Discussed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2004

Jt Cit Vs. Oceanic Farms (Export) (P) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-29-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)91TTJ(Mumbai)821

Advocate for Appellant : P. Peerya, for the Assessee Sanjeev Shah, for the Revenue.

ORDERI.P. Bansal, J.M.:This is an appeal filed by the revenue and is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), dated 29-3-2000, for the assessment year 1997-98.2. Grounds of appeal read as under :'1 On the facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 14 2002

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Phoenix Mills Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-14-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD65(Mum.)

1. The Revenue is in appeal against the order of CIT(A)-I, Mumbai dt.27th Nov., 1992, and raised the following ground; "On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial