Advanced Search Results

Delhi University Teachers Assn. and anr Vs. University of Delhi and an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.K. Rao; Mr. Saket Sikri, Advs.

1. This Court on 12th May, 2011, while hearing these two petitions, had passed the following order: "Though this matter was listed for final disposal yet Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, learned Additional Solicitor General along with Mr. Jayant...

Hardev Singh. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 26.4.2010 passed by the Principal Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi in T.A. No. 541 of 2010 (O.A. No. 29 of 2010), the appellant has filed...

Nirmala Anand Vs. Advent Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 91B and 527; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(4), 21 and 23; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 12, 20, 21 and 22; Maharashtra Apartments Act, 1963; Urban Ceiling Law; Urban Ceiling Act; Indian Contract Act - Sections 31, 32 and 56; Companies Act

Reported in : AIR2002SC2290; 2002(4)ALD3(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)862; 2002(6)BomCR134; JT2002(Suppl1)SC522; 2003MPLJ285(SC); 2002(4)SCALE601; (2002)5SCC481; 2002(2)LC906(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Arunabh Choudhary,; R.N. Karanjawala,; Ankur Chalila and

Raju, J.1. The above appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 15.7.1987 of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Appeal No. 204 of 1981, whereunder the judgment and decree dated...

Eic Holdings Limited Vs. Calcutta Dock Labour Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. During the pendency of this matter, the parties have amicably settled the matter. Mr. P.P. Tripathi, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Calcutta Dock Labour Board, on instructions, submit that the respondent...

Ramniklal N. Bhutta and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11 and 48

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)68; AIR1997SC1236; JT1996(10)SC452; 1996(8)SCALE417; (1997)1SCC134; [1996]Supp8SCR787

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Tripathi and; Bina Gupta, Advs.

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is preferred against the order of the Bombay High Court dismissing the review petition filed by the appellant. The review petition was filed by the appellant against the order dismissing his...

Chanderwati and ors. Vs. Universal Fire and General Insurance Companya ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A

Reported in : II(1985)ACC150; [1987]62CompCas315(Delhi); 28(1985)DLT114

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Tripathi,; S.K. Kaul,; S.C. Sharda and ;

S.B. Wad, J. (1) This is the First Appeal filed by the claimants against the order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Delhi. The Tribunal has dismissed the claim of the claimants. Prem Prakash died as a...

Ashok Kumar Gupta and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(1), 13(2), 14, 15(1), 15(4), 16(4A), 16(1), 16(4), 32, 32(4), 33, 34, 38, 46, 51A, 141, 142, 145(5), 309 to 312A, 335 and 368; Uttar Pradesh Service of Engineers (Public Works Department) (Higher) Rules, 1990 - Rules 5, 6, 7, 8 and 18

Reported in : JT1997(4)SC251; 1997(3)SCALE289; (1997)5SCC201; [1997]3SCR269; (1997)2UPLBEC1417

Advocate for Appellant : Raju Ramachandran,; P.P. Tripathi,; Anil Kumar Gupta, Advs.

K. Ramaswamy, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment dated 4th August, 1983 of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, in Write Petition No. 3088 of 1993. The writ petition also...

G.S. Mander and ors. Vs. Indian Olympic Association and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)738; 1995(1)ARBLR312(Delhi); 1995(32)DRJ527

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Venugopal,; P.P. Tripathi,; A. Dipankar,;

R.C. Lahoti, J.(1) The plaintiffs have filed this suit challenging the legality and validity of, and the mode and manner in which, the elections of the Execution Council of the Indian Olympic Association (hereinafter Ioa, for...

Surrrindra SteIn Malt Co. Ltd. Vs. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 456

Reported in : I(1990)BC406; 41(1990)DLT586

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Nayar,; P.P. Tripathi,; P.C. Khanna and;

Leila Seth, J.(1) By this appeal, the appellant is challenging the order dated 4th April, 1986 passed by Mr. Justice B.N. Kirpal. (2) We set out the relevant facts. The company was ordered to be wound...

Sahara India Airlines Ltd. Vs. R.A. Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 149

Reported in : 1997(43)DRJ217; (1997)117PLR49

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Tripathi,; Neelima Tripathi,; Archana Malik,;

Arun Kumar, J.(1) This is an appeal against an order dated 14th May 1996 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court granting exemption to the plaintiffs from paying Court fee and directing that in...