Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p p naolekar · Page 1 of about 459 results (0.048 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 2008

P.S. Gopinathan Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala State Higher Judicial Service Rules; Kerala Judicial Service Rules, 1991; Kerala Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1961 - Rules 1, 2, 5(2) and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 233 and 233(1)

Reported in : 2008(7)SCALE564; (2008)7SCC70; 2008(3)SLJ268(SC); 2008AIRSCW4602; AIR2008SC2768; 2008(4)Supreme85

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv.,; Jayanth Muthraj and; K.V. Mohan

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant was directly recruited to the post of Munsiff and was later promoted to the post of Subordinate Judge. Thereafter, the appellant was promoted to the Kerala State Higher Judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1991

Amarchand Vs. Arun Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-27-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 409 and 494; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 204(2), 311 and 482; ;Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1991CriLJ3001

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Naolekar, Adv.

ORDERB.M. Lal, J.1. The order passed in this Criminal Revision No. 281 of 1990 shall also dispose of Misc. Criminal Case No. 2265 of 1990 (Arun Kumar Jain v. Amarchand Jain).2. The applicant Amarchand filed a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1992

Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singhai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-18-1992

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Selection for Post-Graduate Courses (Clinical, Para-Clinical and Non-Clinical Courses) in Medical Colleges of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 1984 - Rule 9.5

Reported in : 1992(0)MPLJ586

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Naolekar, Adv.

D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The order passed in this petition shall also decide Misc. Petition No. 531 of 1991 (Dr. Sunil Kumar Gupta v. State of Madhya Pradesh), in which common questions of fact and law arise.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 13 2007

Manjula Sircar and ors. Vs. Harendra Bahadur Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-13-2007

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : JT2007(11)SC546; AIR2007SC3211; 2007(5)ALT78(SC); 2007(4)AWC4057(SC); [2007(115)FLR349]; 2007(11)SCALE90; (2007)7SCC488; 2007AIRSCW5822.

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve and; Rakesh Diwedi, Sr. Advs.,; Manoj Swarup

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. In the interview held for appointment to the posts of Civil Judge (Jr. Division) by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission in pursuance of the advertisement...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2008

Poona Timber Merchants and Saw Mill Owners Association Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 126(1) and 127; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : JT2008(4)SC632; 2008(4)SCALE737; 2008AIRSCW2865

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Andhyarujina,; R.F. Nariman,; K.K. Venugopal,;

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. In all these cases certain provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (in short the `Act') call for determination. Basically the scope and ambit of Section 127 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2007

Kapildeo Mandal and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-29-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 302, 323 and 452

Reported in : AIR2008SC533; 2008CriLJ730; 2007(3)SCALE562; 2008(1)LC71(SC); 2007AIRSCW7420; 2008(1)Crimes111; 2008(1)AICLR434; 2008(1)KCCRSN40

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Sanyal and; Sunil Kumar, Sr. Advs.,; Ranjan Mukherjee

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 16th April, 2004 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 646 of 1987 and 32 of 1988,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2008

Parakh Foods Ltd. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-2008

Subject : Food Adultration

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 37D

Reported in : AIR2008SC2012; 2008BusLR428(SC); 2008CriLJ2617; JT2008(4)SC291; 2008(2)KLT180(SC); 2008(4)SCALE150; (2008)4SCC584; 2008(1)LC522(SC); 2008AIRSCW2652; AIR2008SC2012; 2008(4)SCC584; (2008)2SCC(Cri)467; 2008CriLJ2617; 2008(2)AICLR545; 2008(2)LH(SC)1609

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok H. Desai, Sr. Adv.,; Amit Dhingra and; Aman Leekha

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court whereby the High Court has held that from the evidence on record the article of food in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2007

Kishore Lal Vs. Chairman, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2007

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 38, 39, 40, 40(2), 46, 46(1), 55A, 56, 59, 68, 70, 74, 75, 75(1), 75(2), 75(3) and 95; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Employees' Provident Fund Act - Sections 5; Employees' State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 56, 57, 58, 60 and 61

Reported in : AIR2007SC1819; 2007(4)ALD36(SC); 2007(3)AWC3082(SC); 2007(2)BLJR1653; 2007BusLRSN-2(SC); (2007)2CompLJ385(SC); I(2008)CPJ13(SC); 2007(3)CTC561; [2007(114)FLR219]; [2007(3)J; 2007LawHerald(SC)1696

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Adv. (A.C.),; Dayan Krishnan,; Nikhil N

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. The appellant was insured with the respondent-Employees' State Insurance Corporation (for short 'the Corporation') with Insurance No. 913644. The employee's/appellant's contribution towards the insurance scheme under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2007

Bihar State Council of Ayurvedic and Unani Medicine Vs. State of Bihar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-01-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bihar Development of Ayurvedic and Unani Systems of Medicine Act, 1951 - Sections 3, 3(1), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 37 and 54; ;Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3, 13A, 13A(1), 13A(2), 13A(3), 13A(4), 13A(5), 13A(6), 13A(7), 13A(8), 13A(9), 13B, 13C, 13C(1), 13C(2) and 14; Bihar Indigenous Medical Educational Institution (Regulation and Control) Act, 1982; Societies Registration Act, 1960; Indian Medicine Central Council (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Secction 13A, 13B, 13B(1) and 13C; Bihar Indigenous Medical Educational Institution (Regulation and Control) Ordinance, 1981; Bihar Indigenous Medical Educational Institution (Regulation and Control) Act, 1981; Bihar Development of Ayurvedic and Unani Systems of Medicines Regulations, 1959 - Regulat

Reported in : AIR2008SC595; 2008(56)BLJR251; 2007(12)SCALE644; 2007AIRSCW7633

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Sanyal, Sr. Adv.,; Akhilesh Kumar Pandey,; Sudhanshu Sar

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. The brief facts of the case are that six petitioners in CWJC No. 7253 of 1998 before the Patna High Court who had obtained GAMS (Graduate of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery) degree from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2008

A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad and ors. Vs. Sarvarunnisa Begum

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD138(SC); 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)463; [2008(118)FLR844]; JT2008(3)SC466; (2008)IILLJ497SC; (2008)4MLJ103(SC); 2008(3)SCALE143; (2008)3SCC402; 2008AIRSCW1946; 2008(4)KCCR2265; (2008)3SCC462

Advocate for Appellant : R. Santhana Krishnan,; K. Radha Rani,; Praveen K. Pandey

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. Leave granted.The respondent's husband died in harness while in service of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation'). The respondent-widow submitted an application expressing her willingness to accept additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial