Advanced Search Results
Gajen Talukdar and ors. Vs. Smt. Dipamoni Das
Guwahati
Mar-24-2005
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372 and 383
P.P. Das, Adv.
A.H. Saikia, J.1. Heard Mr. P. P. Das, learned Counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. J.I. Borbhuyan, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.2. The legality and correctness of the judgment dated 4-1-2000 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParvathi, Vs. Ponnammal,
Chennai
Sep-16-2002
PropertyCivil
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1) and 14(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 20, Rule 12
(2002)3MLJ767
R. Sekar. Adv. ;for ;M.S. Krishnan, Advs.
A. Ramamurthi, J.1. The plaintiffs in the suit are the appellants.2. The case in brief is as follows:- The plaintiffs filed a suit for partition and separate possession of their half share in the suit property...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopi Kanta Bania and anr. Vs. Hemolata Devi and ors.
Guwahati
Aug-16-2007
Civil
T. Nanda Kumar Singh, J.1. Heard Mr. C.K.S. Baruah, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. P.P. Das for the appellants/defendants and Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuiyan, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents/plaintiffs.2. The challenge in this second appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Jogen Das and ors. Vs. State of Assam
Guwahati
Nov-30-1994
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 30; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100(4) and 313
N.S. Deka, J.K. Baishya, P.P. Das, Advs. in Cri. Appeal No. 147/93 and D. Das, Adv. Amicus Curiae in Cri. Appeal No. 173(J)/93
J. Sangma, J.1. The questions that fall for the determination in these appeals are : (1) whether Jitan Das (the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 173(J)/93) could be convicted on the basis of the confession which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.B. Khatavkar Vs. S. Taki Beligrami
Mumbai
Aug-07-1970
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 5, 10(1), 17, and 25H; Minimum Wages Act 1948 - Sections 5 and 17; Employees Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions act - Sections 2 and 2(10)
(1971)73BOMLR570; (1971)IILLJ445Bom; 1971MhLJ753
Tarkunde, J.1. At the relevant time S. 3(13) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act ran as follows : 'employee' means any person employed to do any skilled or unskilled work for hire or reward in any...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBallarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Oct-11-1988
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 9(1), 34A and 36A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 7, 8, 8(1), 52A, 52A(5), 173C, 173G, 173G(2), 173G(2A), 173G(3), 173Q, 197 and 198(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 42(1), 46(4) and 113; Constitution of India - Article 226
1991(51)ELT13(Bom)
Dhabe, J.1. The claim of the petitioner company in the instant writ petition is that it is entitled to the benefit of a concessional rate in respect of sale of white printing paper manufactured by it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshariprasad S/O Sadhuram Tiwari Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-05-1987
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1); Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13) and 42(4)
1987(3)BomCR74
Anand Parchure, Adv.
M.S. Deshpande, J.1. This petition is directed against the order of the First Labour Court holding that a complaint by an employee under section 28 (1) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Pentayya Vs. the Joint Manager Food Corporation of India and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-27-1991
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 33C(2); Constitution of India - Article 226
1992(2)ALT107
P.B. Vijaya Kumar, Adv.
ORDERBhaskar Rao, J.1. The simple question this writ petition gives rise to is, whether an application made under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act by a retired workman for recovery of certain monies due for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThakur Prasad Vs. Bhagwandas
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-09-1984
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96, 96(1), 96(3) and 115 - Order 23, Rule 3A - Order 43, Rule 1 and 1A(2)
1985MPLJ149
R.P. Jain, Adv.
C. P. SEN, J.1. This opinion shall also govern Civil Revision No. 1784 of 1983 between the same parties. Both these revisions arise out of the same suit. The following question has been referred by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSusanta Kumar Moharana Vs. Ramesh Kumar Bhatta
Orissa
May-11-2005
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 138B and 142 to 146; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 200 to 202, 203, 204 and 482
2006(1)ALD(Cri)29; IV(2005)BC210; 99(2005)CLT753
J. Katikia, ;S. Patra and ;P.P. Das, Advs.
A.K. Parichha, J.1. Opp. Party as complainant has filed I.C.C. Case No. 113 of 2004 before the Learned S.D.J.M., Nayagarh alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short, 'the N.I. Act') against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »