Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Bakul Cashew Company

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1993(42)ECC65

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Narasimhan

ORDERSathiadev, J.1. Respondents 1 to 3 in W.P. No. 3676 of 1981 are the appellants and the petitioner is the sole respondent therein. On the learned judge remitting the matter for fresh consideration in the light...

Dhole Govind Sahebrao and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

"REPORTABLE" IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2485-2490 OF2010Dhole Govind Sahebrao & others ... Appellants versus Union of India & others ... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2491-2503 OF2010Union of...

Ram Bahal and Anr. Vs. Deputy Director, Consolidation and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION1CIVIL APPEAL No.3594 OF2011Ram Bahal & Anr. .... Appellant(s) Versus Deputy Director of Consolidation Azamgarh & Ors. .... Respondent(s) 2 JUDGMENT R.K. Agrawal, J.1) The present appeal...

Dukes Pharma Vs. Government of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1994(46)ECC286; 1994(69)ELT433(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Alagar, Senior Counsel

ORDER1. In all these cases, though different Notifications are mentioned in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, the sole question of law advanced before me being common, these writ petitions are disposed of by...

K. Srinivasan Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 51, 110, 110(1), 110(2), 119 and 124; Export Control Act

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC257; 1987(27)ELT656(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : M.R.M. Abdul Kareem, Adv.

1. In both these writ petitions, the petitioner is one and the same. However, the facts slightly differ. Therefore, I will first deal with W.P. No. 11392 of 1985. 2. On an information received on 11th...

United Linear Agencies of India (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 116, 128, 129A, 129B, 130 and 130E

Reported in : 1991(55)ELT145(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Gopinath, Adv.

ORDERMohan, J.1. The petitioner before us filed W.P. No. 6562 of 1981, challenging the order of the Deputy Collector of Customs, Customs House, Madras-1, made in IM. 426/79 MCD/L/C) dated 25-7-1981. In and by that order...

Mahavir Metal Works Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1987(27)ELT24(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Habibullah Badsha, Adv.

ORDER1. The prayer in W.P. No. 11316 of 1981 runs as follows :- 'For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ...

Thulasi Ammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Secrertary to ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ662

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.S. Subramanian

ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The petitioners in all the above writ petitions prayed for the issue of a writs of declaration declaring that the words 'on the date of publication of the Notification under Section 4(1)' of...

K.M.L. Narasimhan, Larsen and Tourbo Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1994Mad83; 1994(46)ECC72

Advocate for Appellant : Malini Ganesh, Adv.

ORDER1. Uarson & Toubro Limited, ECC Construction Group (for short 'company') is having its Principal Office at Manapakkam, Madras-600089 while its Registered Office is at 'I., and T House'. Ballard Estate Bombay. The Principal Office of...

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd., Madras Vs. Appraiser, Madras Cus ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14, 25 and 25(1)

Reported in : 1988(15)ECC6; 1988(33)ELT22(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : B.R. Dolia, Adv.

ORDER1. In these four writ petitions, the petitioner is one and the same. In three writ petitions, namely, W.P. 2054, 3257 and 3258 of 1983, the petitioner prays for writs of Mandamus directing the respondents to...