Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ram Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 2(1988)ACC416

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. P.N. Katju

B.L. Yadav, J.1. These two writ petitions, (Writ Petition No. 7866 of 1983 Union of India v. Smt. Ram Devi and Anr. (for short the first petition) and (Writ Petition No. 7867 of 1983 Union of...

D.S. Central Railway Vs. Mohd. Ishaq

Court : Allahabad

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(1990)ACC281

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. P.N. Katju

R.R. Mishra, J.1. Mohd, Ishaq, respondent, was at the material time a workman employed by the D.S. Central Railway, Jhansi and on 29.8.73 received personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of...

Kuldip Oil Industries Ltd. Vs. Ch. Pratap Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bengal Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 15 and 15(3); High Court Rules and Order; General (Civil) Rules, 1952 - Rule 19; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882 - Sections 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 20, Rule 4; Civil Courts Act, 1887

Reported in : AIR1959All505

Advocate for Appellant : D. Sanyal, Adv.

1. This is an appeal by M/s. Kuldip Oil Industries the defendant in the suit. The plaintiff Ch. Pratap Singh filed the suit claiming a sum of Rs. 12,500/- as principal plus Rs. 114/-as interest at...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Janki Prasad Agarwal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1986All15

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Katju, Adv.

A.N. Dikshita, J. 1. The instantappeal under S, 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 20-7-1978 passed by Sri S. B. Misra,...

Prakash Chandra Vishnu Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor VehiclesConstitution

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(8), 2(33), 52, 53(2) and 68; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 94; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1959All373

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Katju, Adv.

ORDERJ.K. Tandon, J.1. These are two separate petitions Nos. 3089 of 1957 and 3090 of 1957, the former by Messrs Prakash Chandra Vishnu Kumar and the latter by Messrs Puran Mal Prabhat Ranjan, both doing business...

Suraj Lal Bal Krishna Das Vs. Padrauna Raj Krishna Sugar Works Ltd. an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 73 and 115

Reported in : AIR1961All371

Advocate for Appellant : Gopi Nath Kunzru and ;P.N. Katju, Advs.

ORDERB. Mukherji, J.1. These five connected applications in revision arose out of a single controversy in which the five applicants were equally /interested: the applications having arisen out of the same order of the Court below,...

Ramai and ors. Vs. State Through Pram Hans Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 345(5A) and 561A

Reported in : AIR1953All525

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Katju, Adv.

Brij Mohan Lall, J. 1. This purports to be an application under Section 345 (5A), Criminal P. C. 2. Six persons were convicted by a Magistrate 1st Class of Gorakhpur of offences punishable under Sections 147,...

Dharamvir and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307

Reported in : 1990CriLJ839

Advocate for Appellant : Vereesh Misra, ;K.P. Singh and ;P.N. Katju, Advs.

Madan Mohan Lal, J.1. This is an appeal against a judgment and order dated 4-5-1978 passed by Sri N. N. Sharma, the then Sessions Judge, Moradabad by which he has convicted all the four appellants under...

L. Jeewanlal Vs. Commr. of Income-tax United Provinces, Lucknow

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 - Sections 2(5); Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66

Reported in : AIR1953All762; [1953]24ITR217(All)

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Pathak and ;P.N. Katju, Advs.

Malik, C.J.1. In this reference under Section 21, Excess Profits Tax Act, read with Section 66 (1). Income-tax Act, the following question has been referred to this Court for decision:'Whether on the facts and in the...