Advanced Search Results

Official Liquidator Vs. T. Sudarsan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(30), 433, 478, 519, 542, 543, 545 and 620A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 130, 260 and 261

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas88(Mad); [2004]49SCL694(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P. Datar, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Company Application Nos. 888 of 1995 is by the official liquidator appointed by this court as liquidator of Messrs. Dhanalakshmi Funds (India) Ltd., praying for certain directions. Company Application No. 1321 of 1995...

D.Baskaran vs Arcot Luthern Church

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 15-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and CMP No. 10346 of 2022 D.Baskaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer : This petition has been filed to set aside the fair order...

L. Chanaraj Vs. T. Rajammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7 and 25

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC237; (1997)IIMLJ427

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Thampi, Adv.

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The appellant in this appeal is the petitioner in Guardian Wards Original Petition No. 68 of 1986 on the file of the District Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil. The proceedings before the Lower Court...

K. Ramapandi Vs. S. Anandraj and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

ORDER (No.109/2010) S. Usha, Vice-Chairman 1. The instant application is for removal of the trade mark “SUNOLA” registered under No. 1178358 in class 29 in respect of refined edible oils under the provisions of the Trade...

J.D. Shanthi (deceased) and Others Vs. M.L. Perumal and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Original Petition No 583 of 1993 was filed under Sections 232 and 276 of Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 for the grant of letters of Administration. Against this petition a Caveat was filed on...

K. Dakshinamoorthy Vs. District Signal Telecommunication Engineer (Wor ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 13 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103; Railway Establishment Code (Conduct and Discipline Rules for Railway Subordinates) - Rule 1712

Reported in : AIR1969Mad201; (1969)ILLJ351Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Anantan Nair, Adv. for ;P.N. George and ;P. Shanta Bai, Advs.

ORDERRamakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner, K. Dakshinamoorthy was employed as a Khalasi in the Signal and Telecommunication Shop in the Southern Railway. He was drawing a pay of Rs. 72/- at the time when the Railway Authorities...

Nagamani Transports Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 159, 221 and 560

Reported in : [1966]36CompCas7(Mad); 1966CriLJ1097

Advocate for Appellant : T.S. Arunachalam, Adv. for P.N. George, Adv.

Ramakrishnan, J.1. There are six petitioners in these revision cases. The first petitioner, Nagamani Transports, is a private limited company, and petitioners Nos. 2 to 6 are its directors. The second petitioner is the husband of...

B. Rajagopal and anr. and P.C. Varghese Vs. Official Liquidator, High ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 542, 543, 543(2) and 545; Reserve Bank of India Act - Sections 45B; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 130

Reported in : [2008]145CompCas305(Mad); (2008)7MLJ515

Advocate for Appellant : Nalini Chidambaram, Adv. for Gladys Daniel, Adv. in O.S.A. Nos. 479 and 480 of 2002 and ;P.N. George Graham, Adv. for Devadason and Sagar in O.S.A. No. 56 of 2004

M. Chockalingam, J.1. These appeals have arisen from the common order of the learned single judge of this court made in C.A. No. 888 of 1995 and C.A. No. 1321 of 2001 in C.P. No. 88...

T.C. Peter Vs. the Union Public Service Commission by Its Secretary, N ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1978Mad87

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. George, Adv.

1. This appeal raises, if we may so term it, a vexed question, which had arisen several times before courts, including the Supreme Court The question is, when action is taken against a student-examinee, for alleged...

In Re: Sekharan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1969Mad320; 1969CriLJ1056

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. George, Adv.

ORDERKrishnaswamy Reddy, J.1. The point that arises in thisrevision petition is whether a SessionsJudge has got power to alter or add tothe charge framed by the CommittalCourt before the commencement of thetrial. 2. What the petitioner...