Advanced Search Results

Jaipur Udyog Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1987)(10)LC691Tri(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Dixit

1. In this appeal, which was originally filed as a Revision Application before the Additional Secretary (Revision Application), Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), the appellants challenged the orders of the lower authorities on grounds of...

Dhani Ram Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 107(1)

Reported in : 9(1973)DLT255; 1973RLR141

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Dixit, Adv

P.S. Safeer, J.(1) Although no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner yet I am to deal with the report submitted by Shri S. C. Chaturvedi, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi under section 488 of the...

Bharat Hiralal Sheth and Others Vs. JaysIn Amarsinh Sampat and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 193, 463, 464, 465, 467, 468 and 471 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401, 482 and 483

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2509

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Deshmukh, ;S.H. Marchant and ;P.N. Dixit, Advs. i/b., ;M/s. Legal Venture;I.S. Thakur, A.P.P.

ORDER1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the respondents. Respondent No. 2 filed criminal complaint against the petitioners in the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla under Sections 193, 465, 467, 468,...

Patel Brass Works Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1994)50ITD322(Ahd.)

1. In this appeal by the assessee two grounds have been raised. Ground No. 1 reads as under : The learned CIT (Appeals) erred in disallowing the claim of loss of Rs. 80,000.2. The assessee, a...

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Laxmi Vishnu Silk Mills

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1994)51ITD207(Ahd.)

Doctrine of merger is not attracted where the appellate authority adjudicated and gave a finding on an issue which was not before him.The contention that the Commissioner was not justified in invoking the provisions of section...

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Anjaria Estate (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1995)55ITD53(Ahd.)

Per Shri B. L. Chhibber, (Accountant Member) - The following identical grounds have been raised in these two appeals by the revenue : (1) The learned CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts in...

Kusumben Kantilal Shah Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)56ITD476(Ahd.)

1. to 2.3. [These paras are not reproduced here as they involve minor issues]. The CIT(A) has erred in valuing the total consideration for sale of shares at Rs. 24,64,000 and the capital gain as Rs....

income-tax Officer Vs. Pirojsha Fakirji Jokhi

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)56ITD175(Ahd.)

1. The only grievance projected in this appeal by the Revenue is that the learned CIT (Appeals) Surat is not justified in deleting the penalty of Rs. 24,950 levied under Section 271(1)(c)of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2....

Sanitax Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)57ITD323(Ahd.)

1. The short but important point which has fallen for decision in these four appeals relates to the valuation of the surplus land under the Urban Land Ceiling Act.2. The assessee is a Public Limited Company...

Sanitax Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Wealth

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)54TTJ(Ahd.)475

The short but important point which has fallen for decision in these four appeals relates to the valuation of the surplus land under the Urban Land Ceiling Act.2. The assessee is a public limited company and...