Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p n chatterjee · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.056 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 1998

Hindusthan Laminators Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Central Bank of India

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-24-1998

Subject : Banking

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227;; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58, 60, 67 and 68;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 16 and 19(1) - Order 34, Rule 4;; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1983 - Section 2, 3, 17, 19, 22, 22(2), 31 and 59;; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 45;; Debt Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Section 29;; Madras Agricultural Relief Act, 1938 - Section 3;; The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Finacial Institutions Act, 1993 - Section 22(1)

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT281(HC),[2000]100CompCas472(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shibdas Banerjee,; Mr. U.S. Menon,; Mr. Joy Saha R.S. Tiwari,; Mr. Amiyanarayan Mukherjee, ; Mr. Pradip Kr. Tiwari,; Mr. P.N. Chatterjee,; Mrs. Anita Mukherjee,; Mr. Kashikanta Moitra,; Mr. Aloke

B.M. Mitra. J. 1. The common point of controversy which requires the considered scrutiny of this court and the petitioners in all the pending petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of india have Joined in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2007

Mahendra Papatlal Shah Vs. Alfred Herbert (India) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-19-2007

Subject : Company

Acts : Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 100 to 103

Reported in : [2008]141CompCas72(Cal),[2008]82SCL165(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Chatterjee, ;K.K. Boral, ;P. Chatterjee and ;Biplab Guha, Advs.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the order dated February 23, 2004, passed by a learned single judge of this Court by which his Lordship rejected an application filed by the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2005

Williamson Magor and Company Limited and Associated Concern Officers' ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(2) and 392

Reported in : III(2006)ACC444,2006ACJ1431

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Chatterjee and ;K.K. Boral, Advs.

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. This appeal is directed against orders dated April 9, 2003 and July 15, 2003,2. It appears that in the appeal an application has been filed by the Williamson Magor & Co. Limited...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 28 2003

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Prasad Vs. Ram Janam Sharma

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-28-2003

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR478; [2003(2)JCR19(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : S.L. Agrawal and; Benami Verma, Advs.

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 28.4.1989 passed by 2nd Additional District Judge, Jamshedpur in Title Suit No. 12/1986-87 whereby he has refused to grant probate of the will...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1992

Sayedabad Tea Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Samarendra Nath Ghattak and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-29-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398 and 399

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas504(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Sen, Adv.

Padma Khastgir, J.1. In the main application, inter alia, under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, the instant applicationhad been taken out by the respondents for an order that the mainapplication be dismissed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1936

Khitendra Nath Roy Chowdhary Vs. Madaneswar Chatterjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-30-1936

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1937Cal297

Ameer Ali, J.1. This suit relates to a ticket taken in the sweepstake organized by the Royal Calcutta Turf Club Derby for the year 1934. The undisputed facts are as follows: The defendant Madaneswar Chatterjee, who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2001

Khurshid Alam Vs. P. Pagnon Company (P) Limited and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Sep-04-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (2002)108CompCas523

1. This is a petition filed by Mr. Khurshid Alam, the petitioner herein, on 9 August, 200, under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter called as 'the Act') praying for rectification of register of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1975

Madanlal Patodia and ors. Vs. Luxminarayan Cotton Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-13-1975

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974; ;Company Law; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 111, 155 and 637; ;Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Section 18A

Reported in : [1978]48CompCas747(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Mukherjee and ;Padma Khastgir, Advs.

S.K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, inter alia, for rectification of the register of shares of the respondent No. 1 in the names of the respective...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2000

Mridul Kanti Majumder Vs. Smt. Jyotsna Bal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-14-2000

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2001)1CALLT285(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pratap Chatterjee and ;R. Bachawat, Advs.

T. Chatterjee, J.1. By consent of parties, this appeal is treated as on day's list and is taken up for hearing along with the application for stay.2. This appeal is preferred against an order dated 28th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2006

Shambhu Nath Das Vs. Samita Ghosh Moulick

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-01-2006

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN781

Advocate for Appellant : Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, ;Chandrodoy Roy and ;S.K. Mina, Advs.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. I have gone through the draft judgment prepared by my learned Brother with brevity but clarity and I fully agree with His Lordship's findings and ordering portion. Still then, I feel, I...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial