Advanced Search Results
Natarajan and Other Vs. State
Chennai
Oct-25-1991
Criminal
1992CriLJ3221
Mr. P.M. Sundaram, Adv.
ORDER1. Both these revisions arise out of the same case and are hence disposed of together. Crl. R.C. 232/87 is by A. 1 in CC. 10291/82 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Madras challenging...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSasikumar Menon vs Krishnankutty Menon
Kerala
Oct-10-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 18TH ASWINA, 1945 RFA NO. 238 OF 2017...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Vs. Mariappan
Chennai
Jan-11-1993
Criminal
1993(1)ALT(Cri)655; 1993CriLJ2780
Mr. T. Sudanthiram, Adv.
ORDER1. Petitioner Ashok Kumar filed a private complaint against respondent Mariappan, who was formerly D.S.P., Kancheepuram and at the time of occurrence D.S.P. Chengalpet. The allegations in the complaint show, that on 23-4-1989 at or about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ujjawal Feeds Vs. Sales Tax Officer and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-09-1993
Sales Tax
Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 43(1)
1994(0)MPLJ762; [1994]95STC447(MP)
B.L. Neema, Adv.
M.V. Tamaskar, J.1. The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture of poultry feeds. By this petition, he challenges the order passed by the respondents 1 and 2 under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Nava Nirman Samithi, Hyderabad Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Nov-08-1989
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294-A
1990CriLJ2620
R. Krishnamoorthy, Adv. for P.M. Sundaram, ;R. Muthukumaraswamy and ;K. Sundareswaran, Advs.
ORDER1. The challenge in this writ petitioner is against G.O. Ms. No. 1101 Finance (Raffles) Department, dated 6-10-1989. By the said G.O., the State Government directed that the sale of lottery tickets of the Government of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPlating Chemicals Vs. Dy. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports
Chennai
Nov-11-1988
Customs
Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 5 and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2(1), 24(8), 25, 25(1A), 173, 198, 210(1), 301(1), 302 and 495; Customs Act, 1962
1992(61)ELT595(Mad)
N.T. Vanamamalai, Adv. for ;V. Gopinath, Adv. ;K. Selvarangan, ;P.M. Sundaram, ;K.A. Panchapagesan and ;A. Raghunathan, Advs.
ORDERK.M. Natarajan, J. 1. Since common questions were raised in all these matters, they were heard together and disposed of by a common judgment. The facts which are necessary for the disposal of these matters can...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Amaravathy and ors. Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Secreta ...
Chennai
Jan-23-2004
PropertyTenancy
Constitution of India - Article 226
2004(2)CTC97
No Appearance
ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J. 1. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners either at 11.30 a.m. or at 12.30 p.m. Hence these matters were passed over and called at 2.15 and again at 4.00 p.m....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Suyambu
Chennai
Jul-17-1990
Criminal
1991CriLJ2506
Mr. P.M. Sundaram, Adv.
Padmini Jesudurai, J.1. The appellant in C.A. No. 282 of 1989 was the 1st accused in S.C. No. 144 of 1984 on the file of the First Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. He was convicted for an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Premkumar Vs. Rajangam
Chennai
Apr-29-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 294, 323, 324, 332, 341 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 245
1997CriLJ3288
P.M. Sundaram, Adv.
ORDER1. This revision filed by the petitioner who is the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pandaloor Sub-Division, Nilgris is directed against the order in Cr. M.P. No. 3342 of 1995 in C.C. No. 224 of 1994 on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Karthikeyan and Others Vs. State by S.i. of Police and Others
Chennai
Jul-22-1991
Criminal
1992CriLJ2948
Mr. V. Sairam and ;P.M. Sundaram, Advs.
ORDER1. These two petitions are disposed of together by a common order, since the question raised is identical. 2. Both these petitions have been filed under S. 482, Cr.P.C. to call for the records in pending...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »