Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p m shah · Page 1 of about 190 results (0.295 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 05 2003

Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-05-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Act, 1961 - Sections 2(19); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119 and 194A(3); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(19)

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR966; 2004(2)BomCR88; [2004]265ITR423(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj353

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel and ;P.V. Barde, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 563 of 2003 and ;A.G. Talhar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 2261 of 2003

B. B. Vagyani, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was enacted with a view to provide for orderly development of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2003

The Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-05-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(19); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119 and 194A(3)

Reported in : (2003)184CTR(Bom)343

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, ;P.V. Barde and ;A.G. Talhar, Advs.

B.B. Vagyani, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was enacted with a view to provide for orderly development of the co-operative...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2007

Adinath Limbaji Navale and ors. Vs. Policeman Housing Society and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 41 and 53A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 164; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 64, 65 and 144; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950; Mohammedan law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR737; 2007(6)MhLj781

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Deshmukh, Adv. for ;P.R. Deshmukh, Sr. Counsel, ;S.S. Choudhari, Adv. ;P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel for ;S.M. Kulkarni, ;R.N. Dhorde and ;M.P. Harjule, Advs.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. These three appeals and Cross Objection arise out of Judgment rendered by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Beed in suit for recovery of possession and mesne profits. (Special Civil Suit No. 14 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 11 2007

Nathu Hiraman Bharambe and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(3), 113A, 126, 126(1) and 127; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 52A

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR481; 2007(6)MhLj289

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Adv. and ;P.V. Barde, Adv.

P.R. Borkar, J.1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With consent of the respective parties taken up for final hearing. 2. The petitioners, who are owners of land admeasuring 26 Are out of total 47 Are of Survey...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2005

Marathwada Association for Social Services Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 82, 82(1), 82(3), 82(4), 82(5) and 83; National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 - Sections 5(1), 14, 14(1), 15(1) and 32; National Council for Teachers Education (Form of application for recognition, the lime of submission of application, determination of norms and standards for recognition of teachers education from time to time and permission to start new course or training) Regulation, 2002; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR784; 2005(3)MhLj308

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah and ;N.L. Jadhav, Advs. in W.P. No. 7676 of 2004 and ;V.G. Gangapurwala, Adv. holding for ;J.R. Patil, Adv. in W.P. No. 7677 of 2004

M.G. Gaikwad, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, petitions are heard and decided finally.2. These two petitions have been decided by this common judgment as in both petitions point involved and relief claimed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2007

Bhagwanrao S/O. Vishwanath Vyawhare and anr. Vs. Sau. Sunita W/O. Gopi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-10-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 - Order 43, Rule 27; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 36, 36(1), 36(2), 37 and 38; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR68; 2007(6)BomCR275; 2008(1)MhLj417

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Adv. for; N.C. Garud, Adv.

R.M. Savant, J.1. Rule, with the consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2008

Shri Yashwant Dagdu More Vs. Mayuresh Builders and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-23-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR214; 2008(5)BomCR45; (2008)110BOMLR2358; 2009(1)MhLj326

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel and ;Mukul Kulkarni, Adv.

R.M. Savant, J.1. Rule. With the consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. This Petition takes exception to the order dated 12.9.2006, passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Dhule by which order,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2007

Mega Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Contract

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 73; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2007Bom156; 2007(2)ALLMR547; 2007(4)BomCR732; 2008(1)CTLJ120(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Dhorde and ;R.L. Kute, Advs. in W.P. No. 607/2007, ;P.M. Shah, Sr. Adv. and ;S.P. Shah and ;Mukul Kulkarni, Advs. in W.P. No. 624/2007 and ;N.B. Suryawanshi, Adv. in W.P. No. 623/2007

1. Since all these petitions raise a common question, all these petitions are being decided by this common order. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners questioning the terms of the notice inviting tender, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2009

Yuvraj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-30-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 143(1), 143(3), 147, 147A, 148 to 152 and 154; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Rules

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Bom)283; [2009]315ITR84(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Adv., i/b., ;A.S. Sawant, Adv.

Naresh H. Patel, J.1. The petitioner-assessee challenges the proposed action under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, vide order dated May 17, 2000, of the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 2(1), Dhule.2. The petitioner contends...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2008

Hirabai Baburao Shidankar and Vitthal Baburao Shidankar Vs. Rayat Shik ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4B, 8, 9, 9A, 9B, 9C, 10, 10A, 11, 13, 27, 31 to 31D, 32 to 32-R, 33A, 33B, 33C, 85, 85A, 88, 88B, 88B(1), 88B(2) and 88C; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1960; Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR350; (2008)110BOMLR3422

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel holding for ;S.P. Shah and ;D.B. Rode, Advs.

R.M. Borde, J.1. Heard Shri P.M. Shah, learned Senior Counsel holding for S/Shri S.P. Shah and D.B. Rode, advocates for petitioners, Shri R.N. Dhorde, learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 & 2 and Mrs. B.R. Khekale,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial