Advanced Search Results

Abdul Sattar Rehmanbhai Vs. Julekhabi Rahiman Daryawardi (Smt.) and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 39(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 33C; Employees of Industry covered under Beedi Act

Reported in : 1988(2)BomCR312; (1988)90BOMLR139

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit P. Shah, Adv.

C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. These writ petitions are filed by the Employers challenging the orders passed by the Presiding Officer, II Labour Court, Kolhapur, directing them to pay Rs. 40/- to each of the employees under section...

indu Nissan Oxo Chemical Vs. C.C.E. and C.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC338

1. The Appellants manufacture Oxo alcohol falling under Chapter Heading 29.02 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. In the process of manufacture of the alcohol by-product arises which is called Insan-LE (light ends). The main...

S.P. Abdul Rahim and Son Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ1134Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Habibulla Basha, Sr. Counsel for E.S. Govindan, Adv.

ORDERAr. Lakshmanan, J.1. The prayer in all these Writ Petitions is common. The prayer runs thus:'to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned letter/communication No. TN/8208/ Bidi/Spl/Squad/VLR/94 dated February...

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fu ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(5); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR285(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Rao,; V.P. Singh and; Arun Kumar Singh, Advs.

P.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J.1. CWJC No. 2356 of 1997R was initially filed challenging the order dated 23.6.1997 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jamshedpur holding that the writ petitioner. M/s Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Limited...

Bata India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 17(1) and 17(1A)

Advocate for Appellant : K.D. Chatterjee and U.S. Sahaya, Advs.

S.K. Katriar, J. 1. This writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned orders dated July 8, 1988 (Annexure 1), issued by the respondent-authorities to petitioner Nos. 3 to 5, and dated...

Bharat Containers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Engineering Worker's Union and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ926Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Bhatt, Shri. Nerlekar

Tipnis, J.1. This petition filed by the employer M/s. Bharat Containers Pvt. Ltd. impugnes the legality and corrections of the award dated 17th June, 1993 passed by the Member Industrial Tribunal, Bombay in Reference (IT) No....

Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Mumbai Shramik Sangha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 -- Sections 2 and 10; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952 -- Sections 2; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) ; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2;;Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) ; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2;

Reported in : 1998IAD(SC)321; AIR1998SC720; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)91; JT1998(1)SC73; (1998)ILLJ550SC; 1998(1)SCALE69; (1998)1SCC752; (1998)1UPLBEC484

ORDERJudgment pronounced by M. Jagannadha Rao J.1. The appellant, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter called the 'Corporation') was the first respondent before the High Court in Writ Petition No. 436 of 1991 filed by Mumbai Shramik...

Management of Swatantra Bharat Mills Vs. Workmen of Swatantra Bharat M ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1995IVAD(Delhi)979; 61(1996)DLT557; 1995(35)DRJ530; (1996)IILLJ67Del

Advocate for Appellant : Harvinder Singh,; Deepak Sabharwal and; N.M. Popli, Adv

M. Jagannadha Rao, J. (1) Thirty five workmen of a statutory canteen established by the Mills (managed by DCM) under Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948 to cater to the 5000 workers in the Mill,...

Cotton Corporation and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 5 and 19A

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ1015Raj; 1993(1)WLC161; 1992(2)WLN365

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Joshi and; M.S. Singhvi, Advs.

Mathur, J.1. These writ petitions involve common question of law and, therefore, they are disposed of by this common judgment.2. For the convenient disposal of all these writ petitions, the facts given in the case of...

D.K. Chaplot Vs. Regional Manager, National Insurance Company and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 - Rules 2 and 25(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 92(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 127

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC717; 2001(3)WLN205

Advocate for Appellant : Naina Saraf, Adv.

Sharma, J. (1). The petitioner appellant hereinafter to be called as 'the petitioner') employed as a Development Officer, Branch-II with the respondent National Insurance Company and was posted in the Divisional Office at Udaipur. He was...