Advanced Search Results
Vinodbhai Bikhabhai Harijan Vs. Election Officer and Additional Taluka ...
Gujarat
Jan-15-1998
Election
(1998)1GLR604
Mr. P.M. Dave
J.M. Panchal, J.1. By means of filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order to set aside...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAquaguard Plastics and Polymers Vs. Commissioner of Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Apr-15-2005
Land Acquisition
Shri. P.M. Dave Ld
1. The prayer in the application is for condoning the delay of about 3 1/2 months in filing the appeal. As per facts on record the appellant had earlier challenged the impugned order before the Hon'ble...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarpIn Pharmacal Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-07-1995
Excise
(1996)(82)ELT330TriDel
1. The captioned three appeals are directed against the order-in-original passed by the Collector, Central Excise & Customs (II), Ahmedabad. In the impugned order, the learned Collector, Central Excise had confirmed the demand for duty amounting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-i Vs. Gujarat Medicraft Pvt. ...
Gujarat
Nov-22-2000
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 52A and 57G; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H
2001(75)ECC256
P.J. Davawala, Adv.
M.S. Shah, J.1. All these applications are filed by the concerned Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The question sought to be raised in these applications is - 'whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAhmedabad Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-22-1994
Service Tax
(1994)(74)ELT947TriDel
1. When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the appellants.However, Shri P.M. Dave, Ld. Counsel for the appellants had requested for adjournment in his application dated 28-10-1994. For ready reference the said request...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Apr-28-1995
Excise
(1995)(78)ELT447TriDel
1. The Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara has preferred this appeal against the order dated 26-11-1993 passed by the Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Ahmedabad. The brief facts of the case as brought out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollr. of Cus. Vs. Gobind Figured and Wired Glass
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-09-1996
Customs
(1996)(86)ELT606TriDel
1. Along with the appeal the Revenue has filed the captioned application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal.2. Arguing on the application No.C/COD/32/95-D Shri Sanjeev Sachdeva, Ld. SDR submitted that the impugned order-in-appeal was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Vrajesh Textile Mills Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-05-1997
MRTP
(1998)(103)ELT80TriDel
1. Whether yarn manufactured by the appellants is classifiable under 18-III(i) as claimed by the assessees under 18-III(ii) as per Department is an issue to be considered in this appeal.2. Shri P.M. Dave, learned counsel, appearing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Navrang Soap Products Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and S.T. ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Feb-03-2014
Service Tax
M.V. Ravindran, J. 1. When these two stay petitions were called out, we find that appeals can be disposed of finally. Accordingly, after disposing the stay petitions we take up the appeals themselves for disposal. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeghdoot Laminates (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-26-1991
MRTP
(1993)(45)LC361Tri(Delhi)
1. The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of decorated laminated sheets falling under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 15A(2).They were selling their product directly to independent buyers. They were also sending the goods on their...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »