Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p m dave · Page 1 of about 53 results (0.180 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 15 1998

Vinodbhai Bikhabhai Harijan Vs. Election Officer and Additional Taluka ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-1998

Subject : Election

Reported in : (1998)1GLR604

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.M. Dave

J.M. Panchal, J.1. By means of filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order to set aside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2005

Aquaguard Plastics and Polymers Vs. Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. P.M. Dave Ld

1. The prayer in the application is for condoning the delay of about 3 1/2 months in filing the appeal. As per facts on record the appellant had earlier challenged the impugned order before the Hon'ble...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1995

SarpIn Pharmacal Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-07-1995

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1996)(82)ELT330TriDel

1. The captioned three appeals are directed against the order-in-original passed by the Collector, Central Excise & Customs (II), Ahmedabad. In the impugned order, the learned Collector, Central Excise had confirmed the demand for duty amounting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 22 2000

Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-i Vs. Gujarat Medicraft Pvt. ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-22-2000

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 52A and 57G; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC256

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Davawala, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. All these applications are filed by the concerned Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The question sought to be raised in these applications is - 'whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1994

Ahmedabad Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-22-1994

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1994)(74)ELT947TriDel

1. When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the appellants.However, Shri P.M. Dave, Ld. Counsel for the appellants had requested for adjournment in his application dated 28-10-1994. For ready reference the said request...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1995

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-28-1995

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1995)(78)ELT447TriDel

1. The Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara has preferred this appeal against the order dated 26-11-1993 passed by the Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Ahmedabad. The brief facts of the case as brought out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1996

Collr. of Cus. Vs. Gobind Figured and Wired Glass

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-1996

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1996)(86)ELT606TriDel

1. Along with the appeal the Revenue has filed the captioned application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal.2. Arguing on the application No.C/COD/32/95-D Shri Sanjeev Sachdeva, Ld. SDR submitted that the impugned order-in-appeal was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1997

Shree Vrajesh Textile Mills Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-05-1997

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1998)(103)ELT80TriDel

1. Whether yarn manufactured by the appellants is classifiable under 18-III(i) as claimed by the assessees under 18-III(ii) as per Department is an issue to be considered in this appeal.2. Shri P.M. Dave, learned counsel, appearing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2014

M/S. Navrang Soap Products Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and S.T. ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Feb-03-2014

Subject : Service Tax

M.V. Ravindran, J. 1. When these two stay petitions were called out, we find that appeals can be disposed of finally. Accordingly, after disposing the stay petitions we take up the appeals themselves for disposal. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1991

Meghdoot Laminates (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-26-1991

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1993)(45)LC361Tri(Delhi)

1. The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of decorated laminated sheets falling under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 15A(2).They were selling their product directly to independent buyers. They were also sending the goods on their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial