Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p m choudhery · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.033 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2001

Steel Tubes of India Limited Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-27-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976

Reported in : [2002]128STC587(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Choudhery, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record of the case I am of the considered view that the issue involved in this writ is covered in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2003

Keshrimal (Deceased) Through Lrs and ors. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(1), 143(2), 143(3) and 147

Reported in : (2003)182CTR(MP)431; [2003]264ITR119(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Choudhery, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The decision rendered in this writ shall also govern disposal of other writ being WP No. 1019/1987 (renumbered as WP 3638/1997) as both these writs involve identical issues and relates to same petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2003

Kesrimal Vs. Ito

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN694(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Choudhery, for the Assessee A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue

ORDER1. The decision rendered in this writ shall also govern disposal of other writ being W.P. No. 1019/87 (renumbered as W.P. 3638/97) as both these writs involve identical issues and relates to same petitioner except the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 2003

Suryakant Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN659(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Choudhery, for the Assessee

ORDERHaving heard the L/c for the petitioner and having perused the record of the case, I find absolutely no merit in this writ and hence it deserves dismissal in limine.2. What is challenged in this writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2003

Suryakant Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 142, 142(3), 158BC and 158BD

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(MP)105

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Choudhery, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record of the case, I find absolutely no merit in this writ and hence it deserves dismissal in limine.2. What...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial