Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p l bansal · Page 1 of about 121 results (0.118 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 08 2005

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. J.B. Exports Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 80I and 260A

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(Del)30; [2006]286ITR603(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : P.L. Bansal and; Vishnu Sharma, Advs

T.S. Thakur, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi bench whereby the Tribunal has partly allowed the assessed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2009

Asian Center for Organization Research and Development Vs. Deputy Dire ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-17-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2009]180TAXMAN175(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Avnish Ahlawat an; Saurabh Chaddha, Advs

ORDER1. The Writ Petition is vehemently opposed by Ms. P.L. Bansal, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the revenue, on the ground that alternative remedy is available to the petitioner. According to the learned Counsel the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2009

Ats Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 64(2), 64(3), 124, 127 and 127(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 11; Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Del)457; [2009]318ITR299(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN486(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Aggarwal; Anil Kher, Sr. Advs.; Prakash Kumar; Kapil Kher an; S.S. Pandit, Advs

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This is the second salvo of the Petitioners seeking to invoke extraordinary of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioners challenge the transfer of their cases from Delhi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 15 2009

Cit Vs. Bharat Alumunium Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-15-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(11), 3.5D, 31(1), 32, 32(1), 37, 41, 41(2), 43, 43B, 80HHC, 82, 139(1) and 254; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); Income Tax Act, 1986; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Income Tax Rules - Rule 5 and 5(2); Income Tax (Amendment) Act

Reported in : [2010]187TAXMAN111(Delhi)

A.K. Sikri, J.1. All these appeals are filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the same assessee, viz., Bharat Aluminum Company Ltd. There are various common issues, which have arisen in these appeals relating to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2011

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ankitech Pvt Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 2(22)(e), 115JB, 8

1. In all these appeals, same questions of law touching the interpretation that is to be accorded to the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the amount received by the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2012

M/S Legrand India Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner Trade and Taxes ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik

% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 W.P.(C) No.4236/2012 SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avadh Kaushik...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2012

Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik

% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 W.P.(C) No.4236/2012 SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avadh Kaushik...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2012

Sunrise Sports (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik

% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 W.P.(C) No.4236/2012 SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avadh Kaushik...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2012

S.D. Enterprises Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik

% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 W.P.(C) No.4236/2012 SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avadh Kaushik...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2010

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-2010

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Adv.

1. Though various questions of law were proposed in this appeal, the appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law: "(i) Whether ITAT was correct in law in allowing provision made by the assessee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial