Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. Syndicate Bank
Karnataka
Dec-05-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]127TAXMAN287(Kar)
E.R. Indra kumar, for the Revenue K.P. Kumar, for the Assessee
ORDERShylendra Kumar, J.In this reference at the instance of the revenue for the assessment year 1987-88 the Tribunal has referred the following 3 questions for the opinion of this court :'1. Whether on the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.N. Reddy Vs. Asstt. Cit and anr.
Karnataka
Apr-17-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)202CTR(Kar)578; [2006]284ITR745(KAR); [2006]284ITR745(Karn); [2006]155TAXMAN295(Kar)
K.P. Kumar for A. Shankar, for the Assessee M.V Seshachala, for the Revenue.
ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.Heard Sri K.P. Kumar, learned senior advocate appearing for Sri A. Shankar for petitioner and Sri M.V. Seshachala, learned Central Government standing counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents and perused the material on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Greaves Limited
Chennai
Oct-03-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 311; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9(1)
2002(80)ECC69; 2002(139)ELT34(Mad)
N.P. Kumar, Spl. P.P.
1. The State represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise is challenging the acquittal of the respondent in E.O.C.C. No. 99/96 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.G. 11, Egmore, Chennai -...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Diebold Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Karnataka
Jan-31-2005
Sales Tax
Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 5(3), 22A, 22A(1), 22A(2) and 24(1); Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 27E(1); Information Technology Act, 2000; Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979
ILR2005KAR2210; [2006]144STC59(Kar)
K.P. Kumar, Sr. Adv. for ;King and Patridge, Advs.
H.L. Dattu, J.1. The appellant is a public limited company engaged in the manufacture and supply of Automated Teller Machines (ATM's for short). In view of the configuration and for the purpose for which is put...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanghameshwar Coffee Estates Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Mar-24-1986
Direct Taxation
Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5(1) and 12; Karnataka Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employment Act, 1976
(1986)55CTR(Kar)252; [1986]160ITR203(KAR); [1986]160ITR203(Karn)
K.P. Kumar, Adv.
K.S. Puttaswamy, J.1. M/s. Attikhan (Biligiri) Limited, Bangalore ('Attikhan'), a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, inter alia, owned an extensive coffee estates measuring about 427 acres in Chamarajnagar Taluk of Mysore District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDattaram Advertising Private Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Oct-11-1990
Sales Tax
Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 11, 12(1), 12(3), 12A, 12A(1) and 23(3)
[1991]81STC394(Kar)
K.P. Kumar for M/s King and Partridge
M.P. Chandrakantharaj Urs, J. 1. There petitions are disposed of by this common order, as all of them raise the same questions of law which are required to be decided by us under section 23(3) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Syndicate Bank (Formerly Syndicate Bank ...
Karnataka
Jan-07-1986
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30, 31, 37, 37(1), 37(4), 141A, 141A(4), 143(3) and 214; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 6C
(1986)52CTR(Kar)117
K. Srinivasan, ;K.P. Kumar and ;H. Raghavendra Rao, Advs.
K.S. Puttaswamy, J.1. In these references and cross-reference made under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Banglore Bench, Banglore (Tribunal), at the instance of the Revenue and the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Coffee Board Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-16-1985
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 17
ILR1986KAR1365; 1985(2)KarLJ397; [1985]60STC142(Kar)
F. S. Nariman, Senior Advocate assisted by R.J. Babu;V.P. Raman, Senior Advocate assisted by T. Subba Rao, ; P.K. Kurien, Senior Advocate, ; K.P. Kumar and ;B. Veerabhadrappa, Advs.
ORDERPuttaswamy, J.1. On a reference made by one of us, these cases were posted before a Division Bench for disposal. 2. A statutory Board called 'the Coffee Board' ('the Board') which was formerly called the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBinani Industries Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax ...
Karnataka
Oct-06-2005
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Articles 142 and 304; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2) 3A, 5(1), 5(3), 5(5), 5(6), 5C, 6, 6(2), 12A, 21 and 22A; Karnataka Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1985 - Sections 5C; Karnataka Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 5C ;Karnataka Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 6(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Rules - Rule 6(4); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 52(2) and 119; ;Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 37B; ;Finance Act, 1964; Karnataka Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act - Sections 6(2); Customs Act, 1985 - Sections 151A
[2006]145STC24(Kar)
Sarangan, Sr. Adv. for ;S. Parthasarathy, Adv., ;S.G. Shivaram, ;Atul K. Alur, ;Ramesh Manchi, ;A. Rama and ;D. Venkatesh, Advs., ;K.P. Kumar Sr. Adv. for King & Patridge, ;M. Thirumalesh, Adv. fo
H.L. Dattu, J. 1. The appellants in these appeals are dealers registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as 'the Act, 1957'). Apart from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNcr Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., a Company Registered Under the Compan ...
Karnataka
Sep-10-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
Companies Act; Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Sections 12(2), 12A and 28(3); Central Sale Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 9(2); Karnataka Value Added Tux Act - Sections 38 and 39; Constitution of India - Articles 269 and 286 and 366(29A)
(2009)22VST371(Karn); 2009(2)KCCRSN62; 2009(4)AIRKarR436
K.P. Kumar, Sr. Counsel,; King and; Partridge, Advs.
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Companies Act and having its registered office at Bangalore. The petitioner has a manufacturing unit at pondicherry. The petitioner is registered under the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »