Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. Mithan Lal Puran Mal
Allahabad
Apr-26-2005
Direct Taxation
[2006]155TAXMAN7(All)
R.K. Upadhyaya for the Applicant P.P. Kar for the Respondent.
ORDERThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi has referred the following question of law under section 256(l) of the Income Tax Act, 196 1, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'for opinion to this Court.'Whether on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghunath Ray and Another Vs. Madhabananda Mallik
Orissa
Aug-29-2000
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 5 and 8
91(2001)CLT140
Mr. P. Kar, Adv.
L. Mohapatra, J.1. This revision has been filed against the order dated 9-3-98 passed by the Civil judge (Senior Division), Bhadrak, rejecting the application filed by the petitioners under section 47 read with section 151 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMotor House Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Jul-25-1990
Sales Tax
Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 11, 12(4) and 24
[1990]79STC385(Orissa)
P. Kar, Adv.
S.C. Mohapatra, J. 1. On the following question, the statement was called for in respect of the years 1974-75 and 1975-76 for which the dealer has been assessed.'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sajitha Bakery
Orissa
Aug-05-1991
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 144B, 153 and 271(1)
[1991]192ITR658(Orissa)
R.P. Kar, Adv.
S.C. Mohapatra, J. 1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue. 2. The following question has been referred to this court for answer : 'Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSridhar Panda Vs. Taramani Dibya and anr.
Orissa
Jun-30-1997
Civil
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211, 212 and 213; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115
84(1997)CLT323; 1997(II)OLR161
P. Kar, A.K.J. Mohapatra, D. Das and K. Rout
A. Pasayat, J. 1. Petitioner's, prayer for temporary injunction to restrain the opposite parties from entering upon the suit land, causing waste and damage to the same, or altering the existing structure and from interfering with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDuryodhan Samal and ors. Vs. Padma Charan Biswal and ors.
Orissa
Sep-01-1995
Property
Easments Act, 1882 - Sections 28
AIR1996Ori47
P. Kar, Adv.
D.M. Patnaik, J.1. The sole point for decision in this appeal is, whether the respondent No. 1 has acquired a prescriptive right of easement of way over the disputed plots, morefully described in the schedules to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayadeb SwaIn Vs. Santha Behera and ors.
Orissa
Jul-11-2006
CivilProperty
Evidence Act - Sections 95 and 97
AIR2007Ori15; 2006(II)OLR286
P. Kar,; D.K. Sahoo,; G. Rout and;
A.K. Parichha, J.1. The judgment and decree in Title Appeal No. 18 of 1982-1 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Bhadrak has been assailed in this appeal.2. The present Respondent No. 1 as plaintiff filed O.S....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Nayanananda Nayak Vs. Ahalya Dei and ors.
Orissa
Jul-19-1985
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151
1985(II)OLR216
P. Kar and D.K. Sahoo
S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Defendant No. 1 is the petitioner. Aggrieved by an order refusing to entertain an application under Section 151, Civil Procedure Code, this Civil Revision has been filed.2. I have perused the impugned order....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshab Charan Sahoo Vs. Mahani Charan Rout and ors.
Orissa
Jul-23-2005
PropertyConstitution
Orissa Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation of Land Act, 1972
2005(II)OLR270
P. Kar, Adv.
L. Mohapatra, J.1. The petitioner in this writ application calls in question the legality of the orders passed by the authorities under the Orissa Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation of Land Act (hereinafter called...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBraja Mohan Jena and ors. Vs. Haripada Bayan and anr.
Orissa
Apr-15-1996
Motor Vehicles
81(1996)CLT660
N. Paikray, ;R.P. Kar, ;A.N. Ray, ;B.P. Mohanty and ;M.K. Badu, Advs.
Dipak Misra, J.1. There is no question here of what may be called sentimental damages, bereavement or pain and suffering. It is a hard matter of pounds, shillings and pence, subject to the element of reasonable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »