Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. Ceekay Associates (P) Ltd.
Allahabad
Feb-09-2005
Direct Taxation
[2005]147TAXMAN624(All)
A.N. Mahajan, for the Applicant P.K. Singhal, for the Respondent.
ORDER By the Court The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi has referred the following question of law under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Jagdish and Others
Allahabad
Apr-29-1999
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23, 23(I-A), 23(2) and 28; Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (Amendment) Adhinyam, 1984 - Sections 32 and 55; Urban Land Ceiling Act;
1999(3)AWC2363
Shitla Prasad and ;P.K. Singhal, Advs.
Palok Basu, J. 1. This bunch of thirty appeals arises out of references filed before the District Judge, Moradabad (for short the D.J.) under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. 1894 (for short the Act)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinay Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-10-2000
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 466
2000CriLJ136
R.P. Agarwal, Adv.;Anurag Khanna, Adv. for PICUP ; P.K. Singhal, Adv. for Syndicate Bank;Vikram Nath, Adv. for IIBI ;Pradeep Agarwal, Adv. for J.G. Finance Ltd. ; Official Liquidator for company
M.C. Jain, J.1. The company in question, M/s. Srishti Video Corporation Limited, was ordered to be wound up by order dated August 16, 1999, in this case. There were four other winding up petitions against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prathma Bank Vs. Consumer Protection, District Forum, Moradabad and An ...
Allahabad
Sep-02-1998
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 (1) and 11; Constitution of India - Article 226
1999(1)AWC67
P.K. Singhal, Adv.
R. K. Mahajan, J.1. We have heard Sri P. K. Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Sarita Singh learned standing counsel.2. This case arises out of the following facts as revealed from the record...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadha Devi (Smt.) Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-29-2004
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 21(1), 22 and 24
2005(1)ARC11
P.K. Singhal, Adv.
Vikram Nath, J.1. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 8.5.1985 passed by the Additional District Judge, Rampur in Rent Appeal No. 77 of 1984 Smt. Mithilesh Kumari and five Ors. v. Dharam Pal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Srishti Video Corpn. Ltd.
Allahabad
Apr-30-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 466
[2005]63SCL171(All)
P.K. Singhal, ;J.C. Bhardwaj, ;J.S. Tomar and ;Vikram Nath, Advs.
ORDERTarun Agarwala, J.1. A number of petitions were filed for winding up of the company known as M/s. Srishti Video Corpn. Ltd. under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. This Court on 16-8-1999...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShabbir and anr. Vs. Ashfaq Ahmad and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-09-1988
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 104(4) - Order 39, Rule 2A - Order 43, Rule 1
AIR1988All223
P.K. Singhal, Adv.
N.N. Mithal, J. 1. This F. A. F. O. purports to be under Order 41, Rule l(r), C P. C. For the caveator Sri S.M. Chaturvedi has raised a preliminary objection before admission of this appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKomal Singh Son of Sri Man Singh Vs. General Manager (P) (Appellate Au ...
Allahabad
Sep-05-2006
Service
(2007)2LLJ431All
Sri. J.N. Tiwari
Dilip Gupta, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 18th March, 2000 passed by the Assistant General Manager, Syndicate Bank by which the petitioner has been removed from the services of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRathi Industries Limited Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-13-2005
Service Tax
(2005)(100)ECC367
1. In this appeal, the appellants have challenged to the validity of the impugned Order-in-Appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the Order-in-Original of the Adjudicating Authority who confirmed duty demand of Rs. 2,11,167 in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishwar Pal Singh Vs. District Magistrate, Meerut and Others
Allahabad
Mar-12-1999
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 16, 18 and 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Article 227
1999(2)AWC1394
Pramod Jain, Adv.
Yatindra Singh, J. 1. This is a tenant's writ petition for quashing of the order dated 26.2.1999 passed by District Magistrate, Meerut refusing to entertain the transfer application filed by the petitioner on the ground that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »