Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p k saxena · Page 1 of about 122 results (0.092 seconds)

Jan 31 2002

Mohd. Umar S/O Bilal Vs. Ashok S/O Dattatray Nayak and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules and Orders - Sections 1 - Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 14; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 23A, 23E and 23J

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT218; 2002(2)MPLJ139

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Sr. Adv. i./b. ;S.C. Shrivastava, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. Applicant-tenant has filed this civil revision under Section 23E of the Accommodation Control Act, against the order dated 18-3-99, passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore, in Eviction Case No. A-9(7) 13/99, allowing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2004

Prakash Chand Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-01-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131(1), 133(6), 142, 147 and 148

Reported in : (2004)188CTR(MP)1; [2004]269ITR260(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena and ;Ranwka, Advs.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ is, whether respondent No. 1--Dy. CIT, Circle-5, Indore was justified in issuing the impugned notices under Section 148 of the IT Act (Annex....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2003

Limdi Bai Vs. Smt. Tulsi Bai (Deceased) Through L.Rs. Harishankar and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63 and 68

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT262

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Sr. Adv. and ;Raunka, Adv.

A.M. Sapre, J. 1. Two Courts have decreed plaintiffs suit for declaration of title in plaintiffs favour, cancellation of sale-deed dated 7-2-1974 executed by defendant No. 1 in favour of defendant No. 2 and sale-deed dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Feb 03 1993

Veniram Ghasiji and ors. Vs. Karamsingh Hiralal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-03-1993

Subject : Property

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 7; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 171

Reported in : 1993(0)MPLJ347

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Adv.

V.S. Kokje, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the respondents against the appellants for a declaration and a mandatory permanent injunction. According to respondents/plaintiffs, they have a right to unobstructed flow of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1994

Fattu @ Fatehsingh Laljiram Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 96, 325 and 326

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ785

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is hereby taking exception to the order of conviction and sentence which has been passed against him by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shajapur in Criminal Case No. 479/88 wherein the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1994

Fattu Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325 and 326

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1970

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is hereby taking exceptions to the order of conviction and sentence which has been passed against him by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Shajapur in Criminal Case No. 479/88 wherein the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2003

Sagar Samir Production Vs. Bank of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-2003

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19

Reported in : [2003]42SCL560(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena and ;Rawka, Advs.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record of the case, I find no substance in the writ hence, it merits dismissal 2. What is challenged in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2004

Lattu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 27, 32, 45 and 60

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT392

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Sr. Adv. and ;Rawka, Adv.

S.L. Kochar, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 25-7-1995 rendered in Sessions Trial No. 29/93 by the learned First Addl. Sessions Judge, Khargone, thereby by finding the appellant guilty...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2003

Shantilal (Bum Bum) Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2003

Subject : Election

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 32B and 32C

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT326

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Sr. Adv. and ;Rawka, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. By filing this writ, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order, dated 12-10-2001 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No. 1, whereby petitioner has been disqualified for being chosen as a member of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2000

Madhusudan Vs. Chandarlal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-02-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT369

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena and ;Saraf, Advs.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This appeal is preferred by one of the defendants of Civil Suit No. 21-A/91 under Order 43 Rule (1) (d) of C.P. Code against an Order dated 12-3-1997, passed by XIV Additional District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.