Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p k roy · Page 1 of about 361 results (0.198 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 1998

Alok Kr. Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-04-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 226;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24 and 24 (4 and 5);; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 11A

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT146(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Bandyopadhyay and ;Mr. D. Dutta and ;Mr. P.K. Roy, Advs.

M. H. S. Amari, J. 1. Pursuant to the directions of the Division Bench dated 3rd December, 1997 passed in M.A.T. No. 4082 of 1997, the above two writ petitions have been heard analogously arid are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1995

Pam Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Port Trust and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-08-1995

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20, 20(1), 20(3) and 20(4)

Reported in : (1995)2CALLT84(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. This application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, involves certain interesting points of law regarding appointment of Arbitrators and Umpires in arbitration proceedings and the maintainability of a second application under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1999

Gopeswar Prasad Agarwal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-14-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1999Cal159

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy and ;Asoke Banerjee, Advs.

ORDERK.J. Sengupta, J.1. The writ petitioner herein claiming one of the co-owners of a plot of land bearing R. S. Dag No. 462 under Khatian No. 226, Mouza Mondalghanti, P. S. Rajarhat, District-24 Parganas (North) has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 20 1963

Amiya Gopal Hazra and ors. Vs. 2nd Land Requisition Collector and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-20-1963

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 162; ;Land Acquisition Act - Section 4; ;Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1964Cal587

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Chakravorty, Govt. Pleader;P.K. Roy, ;S.K. Lahiri and ;P.K. Ghose, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Mukherjea, J.1. In this application the legality of certain land acquisition proceeding started by the State of West Bengal has been challenged. The short facts of the case are as follows: The Petitioners are joint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1983

Krishna Kumar Damani Vs. RamnaraIn Agarwal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-13-1983

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 24; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 20, 24(1), 24(2) and 24(5); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1984Cal162

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy, Adv.

ORDERMonjula Bose, J.1. This application under Clause 13 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeks, inter alia, withdrawal of Title Suit No. 60 of 1982 (Shri R....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1977

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. PulIn Chandra Daw and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-19-1977

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 14

Reported in : AIR1977Cal443

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy and ;P.K. Ghosh, Advs.

ORDERMonjula Bose, J.1. The point of law which arises for determination in this suit, is whether the plaintiff can take advantage of Section 14 of the Lim. Act, 1908 by reason of earlier proceedings and thereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1973

Deepchand Mini Vs. Ticamchand Mini

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-12-1973

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 47; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 74

Reported in : AIR1974Cal222,78CWN478

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy, Adv.

ORDERS.C. Deb, J.1. In order to appreciate the questions involved in this specially assigned application it is necessary to set out below the material portion of the compromise decree dated March 22, 1968 passed in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1973

Ramnath Das and ors. Vs. Saha Chowdhury and Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-06-1973

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 47; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1974Cal246

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Sarkar, J.1. This is an application for execution of a decree for costs by and on behalf of the defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3 against the defendant No. 6. The relevant portion of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1995

Kashinath Tapuriah Vs. Incab Industries Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-08-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1913; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 36, 286, 172, 173, 175 and 255; ;Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948 - Section 25; ;Specific Relief Act - Sections 14, 15, 38 and 38(2)

Reported in : [1998]93CompCas725(Cal),99CWN1178

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy, Adv.

Shyamal Kumar Sen, J.1. On October 17, 1994, the petitioner filed the above suit for the following reliefs :(a) A declaration that the plaintiff has been, still is and continues to be the chairman of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1982

Ranjit Kumar JaIn Vs. Kamal Kumar Chowdhury and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-22-1982

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 65; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 218 and 227

Reported in : AIR1982Cal493

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy, Adv.

ORDERPadma Khastgir, J.1. The present suit had been filed by Ranjit Rumar Jain against Kamal Kumar Chowdhury and Ratan Kumar Chowdhury for a declaration that the Registered Indenture of Settlement dated February 14, 1971 executed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial