Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p k roy · Page 1 of about 370 results (0.496 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 1998

Alok Kr. Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-04-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 226;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24 and 24 (4 and 5);; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 11A

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT146(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Bandyopadhyay and ;Mr. D. Dutta and ;Mr. P.K. Roy, Advs.

M. H. S. Amari, J. 1. Pursuant to the directions of the Division Bench dated 3rd December, 1997 passed in M.A.T. No. 4082 of 1997, the above two writ petitions have been heard analogously arid are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1999

Gopeswar Prasad Agarwal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-14-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1999Cal159

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy and ;Asoke Banerjee, Advs.

ORDERK.J. Sengupta, J.1. The writ petitioner herein claiming one of the co-owners of a plot of land bearing R. S. Dag No. 462 under Khatian No. 226, Mouza Mondalghanti, P. S. Rajarhat, District-24 Parganas (North) has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2014

Harekrishna Talukdar Vs. The Assam Power Distribution Co. Ltd [Lar] an ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-26-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Roy Choudhury

A.M. Sapre, CJ. Heard Mr. P.K. Roy Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. B. D. Das, learned Standing Counsel, ASEB, appearing for the respondents. This is an intra-court appeal under Rule 2(3) of Chapter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 21 1994

The Association of Teachers in Anglo Indian School Vs. the Association ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-21-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 19, 28, 28(3), 29, 29(1) and (2), 30, 30(1), 141, 143, 226 and 366(2);; West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8, 8(2), 9, 11, 11(4), (5) and (6), 18(3);; Management of Recognised non-government institutions Aided and Unaided Rules, 1969 - Rule 33;; Code of Regulation for Anglo Indian and other listed Schools, 1993 - Regulations 1(2), 8, 15 and 24;; Kerala University Act, 1969 - Sections 48(1), 49, 56(2) and (4); ; Gujarat University (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 33A(1), 40, 41, 51A(1), 52 and 52A;; Kerala University Act, 1957 - Sections 19(1) and 33(1);; Gujarat University Act, 1949 - Sections 51-A(1) and (2);; Andhra Pradesh Recognised Private Educational Institutions (Control) Act - Sections 3, 3(1), (2), (3) and

Reported in : AIR1995Cal194

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Roy

ORDERSatya Brata Sinha, J.1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 1st Sept. 1994 passed by a Ld. Single Judge of this Court, whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1983

Krishna Kumar Damani Vs. RamnaraIn Agarwal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-13-1983

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 24; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 20, 24(1), 24(2) and 24(5); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1984Cal162

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy, Adv.

ORDERMonjula Bose, J.1. This application under Clause 13 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeks, inter alia, withdrawal of Title Suit No. 60 of 1982 (Shri R....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1963

Amiya Gopal Hazra and ors. Vs. 2nd Land Requisition Collector and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-20-1963

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 162; ;Land Acquisition Act - Section 4; ;Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1964Cal587

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Chakravorty, Govt. Pleader;P.K. Roy, ;S.K. Lahiri and ;P.K. Ghose, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Mukherjea, J.1. In this application the legality of certain land acquisition proceeding started by the State of West Bengal has been challenged. The short facts of the case are as follows: The Petitioners are joint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1995

Pam Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Port Trust and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-08-1995

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20, 20(1), 20(3) and 20(4)

Reported in : (1995)2CALLT84(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. This application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, involves certain interesting points of law regarding appointment of Arbitrators and Umpires in arbitration proceedings and the maintainability of a second application under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1977

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. PulIn Chandra Daw and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-19-1977

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 14

Reported in : AIR1977Cal443

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy and ;P.K. Ghosh, Advs.

ORDERMonjula Bose, J.1. The point of law which arises for determination in this suit, is whether the plaintiff can take advantage of Section 14 of the Lim. Act, 1908 by reason of earlier proceedings and thereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2004

Union of India Vs. Kamrup Industrial Gases Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-29-2004

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9, 17, 20, 34 and 41

Reported in : 2004(3)ARBLR618(Cal),(2004)3CALLT179(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Roy, ;Dipak Kr. Basu and ;Ruma Sikdar, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The defendant/appellant, Union of India, entered into an agreement with the plaintiff/respondent, Kamrup Industrial Gases Limited, for purchase of Oxygen and Acetylene industrial gases on the terms and conditions contained therein. Pursuant to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2003

Nabendu Dutta and ors. Vs. Arindam Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-20-2003

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Comapnies Act, 1956 - Sections 274, 274(1) and 294; ;Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45QA; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas150(Cal),[2004]55SCL146(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Sudipta Sarkar, Sr. Adv., ;P.C. Sen, ;P.K. Roy, ;Hirak Mitra and ;Joyanta Mitra, Advs.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1.In this motion, the petitioner succeeded in obtaining an ad interim order of status quo, passed by this court in a declaratory action for holding that defendants Nos. 1 and 2 have become...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial