Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p k mullick and · Page 1 of about 63 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 15 2004

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Warren Tea Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1A), 2(45), 10(1), 80A, 80A(2), 80AB, 80HHC and 80HHC(4B), ;Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 8; ;Constitution of India - Articles 246, 254 and 366; ;Finance Act, 1999

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Cal)113

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Kapoor, ;P.K. Mullick, ;Anindya Mitra, ;Dipak Shom and ;Md. Nizamuddin, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. :1. The respondents had filed WP No. 1232 (W) of 1997 challenging the vires of Circular No, 600, dt. 23rd May, 1991, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) so far...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1971

B.K. Plastic Industries Vs. Jayantilal Kalidas Sayani

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-08-1971

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patent and Designs Act, 1911 - Section 51A and 51A(1)

Reported in : AIR1972Cal339

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Mullick, Adv.

ORDERS.C. Ghose, J.1. This is an application for cancellation or revocation of the registration of the design bearing No. 134095 dated the 26th June. 1968. This application has been made under Section 51-A of the Patent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1975

indo Traders Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-13-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 184(1) and 184(7)

Reported in : [1978]111ITR355(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Mullick and ;A. Mukherjee, Advs.

Deb, J. 1. The following question is involved in this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 21 2013

Devyani Phosphate Private Limited and anr Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Mullick

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 176/2013 & CM 4923/2013 (interim relief) DEVYANI PHOSPHATE PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.K. Mullick, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA ........

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2005

Donald and Macarthy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-03-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Section 45; ;Major Port Act, 1963; ;Major Port Rules; ;Major Port Regulations

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC88,2005(186)ELT393(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Mullick, Sr. Adv.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J. 1. The Court : This matter was once finally heard and disposed of by His Lordship Mr. Justice Kabir by a detailed judgment and order dated 24th July, 1996 [1997 (89) E.L.T....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2003

Genesis International Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-22-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 76A and 76N; ;Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992

Reported in : 2004(173)ELT235(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Mullick, Senior Counsel

ORDERKalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. By this application the petitioners have substantially challenged the enquiry in relation to the drawback received and/or receivable by the petitioner No. 1 for supplies made at Special Economic Zone under summons...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2008

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Pranab Kumar Mukhopadhyay

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-23-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR32],(2009)ILLJ144Cal

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Mullick and ;Soma Roy Chowdhury, Advs.

ORDER1. This application is directed against the Judgment and order dated May 11, 2006, whereby and whereunder the learned Tribunal has set aside not only the orders of punishment but also the entire disciplinary proceeding holding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1986

Dulichand Shreelal Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-28-1986

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 11A, 11B, 11B(5) and 40; ;State Sales Tax Act - Section 5; ;Contract Act - Section 72; ;Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 29 and 30; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 96; ;Customs Act - Section 27; ;Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 265, 301 and 304; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1) and 11

Reported in : 1987(32)ELT388(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Mullick and ;M.A. Vidyadharan, Advs.

A.K. Sengupta, J.1. The Petitioner, a partnership firm, carries on business of manufacture of vegetable non-essential oils falling under tariff item No. 12 of the Central Excise Tariff at its factory with the solvent extraction plant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1980

Balmukund Mundhra Vs. Shew Prosad Haralka and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-08-1980

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20

Reported in : AIR1980Cal331

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Bhabra and ;P.K. Mullick, Advs.

THE COURT: Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act. The petitioner's case as laid down in the petition, which is not disputed by the respondents, who are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1993

Dwipendra Nath Mukherjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-17-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); ;Calcutta Port Trust Employees' (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulations, 1987 - Regulations 7 and 8A(1)

Reported in : (1993)2CALLT233(HC),98CWN164

Advocate for Appellant : Moni Bhusan Sarkar and ;Gita Gupta, Advs.;P.K. Mullick, ;Alok Banerjee and ;Subimai Mukherjee, Advs.

P.K. Mukherjee, J.1. This writ petition was heard-in-part in the presence of Mr. Moni Bhusan Sarkar and Mrs. Gita Gupta, learned Advocates for the petitioner, Mr. P.K. Mullick, Mr. Alok Banerjee and Mr. Subimai Mukerjee, learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial