Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p k kasliwal · Page 1 of about 42 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 21 2003

Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribuna ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-21-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 44AB and 271B

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Raj)361; [2003]262ITR262(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Kasliwal, Adv.

1. Since both these appeals involve a common question of law, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1994

Jai NaraIn and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-08-1994

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 277 and 278

Reported in : [1994]207ITR632(Raj); 1994(1)WLC510

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Kasliwal, Adv.

Y.R. Meena, J. 1. These three miscellaneous petitions are directed against the order of the Special Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences), Jaipur, dated August 17, 1991, whereby the charges have been framed against the petitioners for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 1996

Laxmi Narayan Sharma Vs. Superintendent, C. Ex. and Cus.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-21-1996

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9(1), 36B, 37(B) and 119; Income Tax Act, 1961; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 245(2) and 482; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9(1), 53(2), 170, 173Q and 226

Reported in : 1996(87)ELT345(Raj); 1996(3)WLC394

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Kasliwal, Adv.

ORDERM.A.A. Khan, J.1. This petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is directed against the order, dated February 1, 1995 whereby the Special Judicial Magistrate (Economic offences) Rajasthan, Jaipur, rejected petitioner's application under Section 245(2) Cr. P.C.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 2003

Smt. Madhu Maheshwari Vs. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-16-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN457(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Kasliwal, for the Assessee Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for the Revenue

ORDERThis appeal has been admitted in terms of the following questions:'1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that Circular No. 648, dated 30-3-1993...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2000

Cit Vs. Rajendra Prasad Gupta

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-09-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)166CTR(Raj)83

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue P.K. Kasliwal, for the Assessee

Rajesh Balia, J.Heard learned counsel for the appellant.2. In this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order of the Tribunal, dated 24-5-1999, setting aside the order of assessing authority on the ground that the assessment made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2004

State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-14-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]142TAXMAN519(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Ranka, P.K. Kasliwal and Raj Kumar Yadav, for the Assessee R.B. Mathur and L.M. Bhardwaj, for the Revenue

ORDER RECALLING EARLIER Counsels: N.M. Ranka, P.K. Kasliwal and Raj Kumar Yadav, for the Assessee R.B. Mathur and L.M. Bhardwaj, for the Revenue Head Note: INCOME TAX Appeal (High Court)-- -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2003

Radhakishan Ramniranjan Vs. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-21-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN204(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Kasliwal, for the Assessee R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue

ORDERThis appeal has been admitted in terms of the following question :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in sustaining an addition of Rs. 85,000 as made by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2003

Surajmal and Party Vs. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-24-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]136TAXMAN1(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Kasliwal for the Appellant.

ORDERIn this appeal the following questions are raised which are stated to be the question of law:'1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in confirming the disallowance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2001

Cit Vs. Agarwal Flooring Stone Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)172CTR(Raj)239

Advocate for Appellant : J.K. Singh, for the Revenue P.K. Kasliwal, for the Assessee

Rajesh Balia, J.The Tribunal Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, at the instance of the Commissioner Jaipur, has referred the following question of law arising out of ITA No. 719/Jp/1988 relating to the assessment year 1985-86 :'Whether, on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2002

Cit Vs. Registhan (P) Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-12-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN2(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Mathur and L.M. Bhardwaj, for the Recenue Sanjeev Pandey and P.K. Kasliwal, for the Assessee

ORDEROn an application filed under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question for our opinion :'Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial