Advanced Search Results

Durga Traders Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1986RLR138

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jaitely,; B.S. Mainie and; B.D. Sharma, Advs

Rajindar Sachar, J.(1) This writ petition seeks writ of mandamus directing railway to give matching delivery against a consignment of coal booked by the petitioners, and which was instead diverted by the railways. (2) The petitioners...

Kali Pershad Vs. Collector

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Requisitining and Acquisitioning of Immovable property Act, 1952 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Schedule - Article 11; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 7(1); Court fees Act, 1870 - Sections 4 and 8

Reported in : 1981RLR73

Advocate for Appellant : Hari Shankar and; P.K. Jaitely, Advs

Rajindar Sachar, J. (1) The properties of the appellant having been requistioned and he having been dissatisfied with the amount offered, the matter was referred for arbitration and an order had been passed u/s 8 of...

Union of India Vs. Ganga Ram Jaibhagwan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act - Sections 46

Reported in : 1981RLR64

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jaitely and; M.L. Bhargav, Advs

S.B. Wad, J.(1) This revision is directed against decree for Rs. 798-80 passed by the First Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, Delhi in Suit No. 712/74. The plaintiff had contended in the suit that the...

Sangeeta Sharma Vs. Rajiv Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24

Reported in : 1994IIAD(Delhi)49; 1994(29)DRJ87

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jaitely and; H.R. Kaushik, Advs

C.M. Nayar, J. (1) The present petition has been filed to impugn the order dated May 13, 1992. passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, by which the application of the petitioner under Section 24...

Sheela Sapra and anr. Vs. New India Electrical Industrial Co. Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT589; 1992(23)DRJ65; 1992RLR253

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Vashisth and; P.K. Jaitely, Advs

C.M. Nayar, J.(1) The present petition has been filed to impugn the order of the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, date September 11,1985, wherein he rejected the eviction petition of the petitioners from the front portion of...

Kamla Marwah Vs. Kapur Fabrics

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 48(1992)DLT636; 1992RLR545

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Kataria and; P.K. Jaitely, Advs

Santosh Duggal, J.(1) The appellant, who is owner/landlady of the demised premises, comprising of drawing-cum-dining room, two bed rooms with attached toilets, kitchen, garage on the ground floor, bed room with attached toilet and servant room...

Bhullan Vs. Ehsan Elahi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Mahomedan Law - Sections 117

Reported in : 1995IIIAD(Delhi)373; 59(1995)DLT324; 1995(34)DRJ475

Advocate for Appellant : Maehswar Dayal,; P.K. Jaitely and; N.Verma, Advs

C.M. Nayar, J. (1) The present second appeal is directed against the judgment dated December 14, 1976, of Additional District Judge, Delhi. The learned Judge upheld the judgment dated March 31,1975 of the trial court in...

Anand Prakash Gupta Vs. Vidya Prakash Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 7; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)279; 71(1998)DLT509; 1998(44)DRJ556; (1998)118PLR81

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jaitely,; Balmiki Mehta,; V.K. Tandon and;

K.S. Gupta, J. (1) This order will govern the disposal of IAs No. 2469/94, 2491/94, 2468/94 & 8262/94. (2) is 2469/94 was filed by Brij Mohan Jain, intervener under Section 151, Code of Civil Procedure alleging...

Union of India Vs. Jashan Mal and Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(4); ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 137; Indian Contract Act - Sections 102, 103, 172 and 178; Gaming Act, 1835 - Sections 2; General Rule

Reported in : AIR1976Delhi335; 1976RLR298

Advocate for Appellant : M. Wadhwani,; P.K. Jaitely,; Madan Bhatia,;

H.L. Anand, J. (1) This judgment would dispose of C.R. 60/72, C.R. 04/72 and S.A.O. 30/73, which raise a common question as to the circumstances in which a consignee may sue the Railways for compensation on...

Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Act, 1890 - Sections 77C

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi346

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Khanna,; P.K. Jaitely and; H.S. Mac, Advs

Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J. (1) This is a claim against the Railways. The plaintiffs, Life Insurance Corporation of India and Lakshmi Udyog (Udyog) have brought this suit for the recovery of Rs. 53,722.50 against the Union...