Advanced Search Results
Gujarat Rajya Ardh Sakari Audhiyogick Karmachari Sangh Vs. State of Gu ...
Gujarat
Sep-08-2004
Service
Contract Labour [Regulations and Abolition] Act, 1970; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226
[2005(106)FLR480]; (2005)1GLR135
P.H. Pathak, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 in Special Civil Application No. 7923 of 1996
H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned advocate Mr.P.H. Pathak on behalf of the petitioners and learned AGP Ms.Nandini Joshi appearing on behalf of respondents.2. In these two petitions, the Dailywagers who are working with the Forest Department,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSureshkumar Dodia Vs. Chief Officer/President
Gujarat
May-04-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10; Gujarat Panchayat Act - Sections 50; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226
(2001)4GLR3518
P.H. Pathak, Adv.
D.C. Srivastava, J.1. A Draft amendment has been given by Shri P.H. Pathak, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeking certain amendments in the petition. The draft amendment is opposed by Shri P.V. Hathi, learned Counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.R. Bharai Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Gujarat
Apr-29-2005
Service
Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rule 77; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25B(1) and 25B(2) and 25F
[2006(109)FLR184]
P.H. Pathak, Adv.
Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This Special Civil Application arises out of the judgment and orders of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ahmedabad Bench, dated 12-03-1998/25-06-1998, in Original Application No. 120 of 1992/Review Application No. 21 of 1998,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hardesh Kumar Rajaram Vs. Kv. B. Unni and ors.
Gujarat
May-04-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 12(5), 25F, 25G and 25H
(2001)2GLR1315
P.H. Pathak, Adv.
H.K. Rathod, J.1. Learned Advocate Mr. P. H. Pathak is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Advocate Mr. M. R. Shall is appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and learned Advocate Mr. Bipin Mehta...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGuj. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. D.V. Chauhan
Gujarat
Mar-21-2006
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 7, 7A, 15, 10, 10(1), 11A and 107A; Industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act, 1971; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 61, 66 and 66(1); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64A; Motor Vehicles (Madras) (Amendment) Act, 1948; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 15(5); Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 78, 78(1) and 79; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2006(111)FLR1097]; (2006)2GLR889; (2006)IIILLJ196Guj
Hardik C. Rawal, Adv.; P.H. Pathak and; D.S. Vasavada
Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. Shri D.V.Chauhan (respondent) was a Conductor at Bardoli Depot of Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (Corporation for short). On 3.5.1990, his duty was on Surat ' Mandvi road. When the bus reached between...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. M.B.R. Patel
Gujarat
Mar-16-2004
ServiceCivil
[2004(102)FLR997]; (2004)IIILLJ1032Guj
Paurami B. Sheth, Adv.
Heard Additional Standing Counsel for Central Government Ms. Paurami B. Sheth on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. P.H. Pathak for respondent.1. Rule. Mr. P.H. Pathak waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent. With...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. R.K. Khola Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad
Apr-04-2001
Right to Information
1. The applicant who was serving as Engineer in the Space Application Centre-the Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad (ISRO) has filed the present O.A. where he has sought following reliefs:- (a) To quash and set aside...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkrishna Bus Transport and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Jun-30-1994
ConstitutionMotor Vehicle
(1994)2GLR1371
C.K. Thakker, J.1. In all these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the action of the respondent authorities of detaining and seizing Motor vehicles under Section 129A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhakant Ayodhya Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad
Mar-12-2001
MRTP
1. Heard Mr. P.H. Pathak for the applicant. Mrs. M.R. Bhatt for the respondents No. 1 and 2, Mr. Girish Patel with Mr. Shalin Mehta for respondents No. 3 to 5. Mr. M.S. Trivedi for respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Ramkishan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad
Mar-04-2002
Arbitration
(2004)(1)SLJ164CAT
1. The applicant who was working as Khalasi under the respondent No. 2 at Dahod workshop is aggrieved on account of penalty of removal from service imposed on him by the Disciplinary Authority (DA) vide order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »