Advanced Search Results
Kishore Singh Ravinder Dev and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Nov-04-1980
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 21
AIR1981SC625; 1981CriLJ17; (1981)1SCC503; [1981]1SCR995
P.H. Parekh,;Amicus Curia
V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.1. The moral of this case is poignant. So long as an iron curtain divides the law set by the Constitution and lit by the Supreme Court from the minions of the State,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. S.K. JaIn Vs. Mr. P.S. Gupta and ors.
Delhi
Mar-14-2002
ServiceConstitution
University Non-teaching Enployees (Terms and Conditions of Services) Rules, 1971 - Rule 44; Constitution of India - Article 14
2002IVAD(Delhi)596
P.H. Parekh, Sr. Adv.,; E.R. Kumar and; Ruchi Khurana,
Usha Mehra, J.1. The employees of the Delhi University were governed by the rules known as The University Non-teaching Employees (Terms and Conditions of Services) Rules 1971 (hereinafter called the Rules). These Rules provided for creation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGunanidhi Martha and ors. Vs. Govt. of Orissa and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-27-2003
Service
AIR2003SC4047; [2003(97)FLR638]; 2003(3)SCALE681; (2003)4SCC661; [2003]3SCR60; 2003(3)SLJ316(SC)
P.H. Parekh,; Samer Parekh,; D.P. Mohanthy,;
ORDER1. The order dated 18th January, 1996 passed by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal is under challenge in these appeals. The controversy relates to selection of Police Constables for training for further promotion to the rank of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. and ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-20-2009
MRTP
Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. E.R. Kumar, Mr. Subhanshu Padhi, Mr. Akshat Jain, Mr. Ashish Vaid, Advocates. Counsel for the Respondent (s): Mr. R
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Several issues have been raised by Mr. P.H. Parekh, learned senior counsel assailing the order impugned. One of the points raised by Mr. Parekh is that one of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrahlad K. Modi and Others (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Oct-18-1994
Property
Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1953 - Sections 5 and 7; Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952
AIR1995SC767; (1996)1GLR68; 1994(4)SCALE667; 1995Supp(2)SCC91; [1994]Supp4SCR468
P.H. Parekh and; B.N. Agrawal, Advs
1. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat in F.A. Nos. 351 & 355/1972. The lands bearing survey Nos. 6 & 9 admeasuring 1 acre 5 gunthas and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanpatrao Gulabrao Pawar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Apr-06-1992
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 9, 12, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 29, 33(1) and (1A), 45(2), 46 and 49
AIR1992SC1183; JT1992(2)SC463; 1992(1)SCALE783; 1993Supp(1)SCC87; [1992]2SCR466
P.H. Parekh, Adv
ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. First appellant-land holder filed a return of his holding under as required by the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling and Holdings) Act, 1961 (Act). After making the necessary inquiry, the Collector, Puna by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrem Chand and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Supreme Court of India
Mar-30-2010
Property
Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23(1A) and 30(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 151 - Order 6, Rule 17
JT2010(3)SC365
P.H. Parekh, Sr. Adv.,; Mohit Choudhary,; Puja Sharma,;
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Leave granted.2. This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court wherein the High Court has awarded the land acquisition compensation @ Rs. 39,300/- per bigha. The High Court relied on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd and A ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-06-2009
MRTP
Counsel for the Appellant(s): Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. E.R. Kumar, MR. Subhanshu Padhi, Mr. Akshat Jain, MS. Mehak Bhalla, Mr. Ashish Vaid, Advocates. Counsel for the Resp
Heard Mr. P.H. Parekh, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant and Mr. R. Chandrachud, the learned Counsel appearing for the Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.. Mr. P. H. Parekh, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Shankar Lal Soni and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-08-2009
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Excise Act; ;Constitution of India - Article 32
P.H. Parekh, Sr. Adv.,; S. Wasim A. Qadri,; A.K. Sharma,;
Harjit Singh Bedi, J.1. This judgment will dispose of the three appeals before us. The facts relating to these appeals are as under:2.1 On 15th October, 2004, one Mr. C.K. Garg, a Senior Advocate in Jaipur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYadu Nandan Garg Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-1995
Property
Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4(1), 6, 9 and 16; Rajasthan Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1969; Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1996SC520; JT1995(8)SC179; 1995(6)SCALE389; (1996)1SCC334; [1995]Supp4SCR710; 1996(1)LC351(SC)
P.H. Parekh,; Krishan Mahajan and; Arvind Kr. Sharma,Advs
1. The preliminary Notification under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 (for short, 'the Act') was published in the Gazette on October 17, 1963 acquiring 99 Biswas & 17 Bighas of land in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »