Advanced Search Results
Meena (Kum.) D/O Suryabhan Bhandakkar Vs. S.D. Chacharkar and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-12-1994
Labour and Industrial
1994CriLJ2647
Shri. A. P. Deshpande
B.U. Wahane, J.1. This is an application filed by the petitioner Ku. Meena Bhandakkar on 11/11/1992 for initiating the proceedings of contempt against the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful disobedience of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRampyaribai Wd/O Sukhdeo Daga and ors. Vs. Niladevi Wd/O Narayandas Ja ...
Mumbai
Apr-30-2007
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A
2007(5)ALLMR95; 2007(4)MhLj213
P.Y. and S.P. Deshpande, Adv.
A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. By the present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 21-3-2006 below Ex. 66 in Regular Civil Suit No. 436 of 1998...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNutan Vidarbha Shikshan Mandal and anr. Vs. Ramakanth Mahadeorao Khot
Mumbai
Sep-14-2007
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9 and 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9A - Order 7, Rule 11; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 - Rules 28, 29 and 31
2007(3)ALLMR798; 2008(1)BomCR267; 2007(6)MhLj310
S.P. Deshpande, Adv.
C.L Pangarkar, J.1. This is an application for review of the judgment delivered in Civil Revision Application No. 930 of 2000.2. Review application has been filed by the applicant in Civil Revision. A few facts may...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ku. Jayashree D/O Manoharrao Badhe Vs. the Secretary Nagpur Shikshan M ...
Mumbai
Mar-13-2000
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 4 and 57(4); Constitution of India - Articles 16(4) and 226; Fundamental Rules - Rule 9(4)
2000(2)ALLMR504; 2000(4)BomCR199; (2000)3BOMLR147; 2000(2)MhLj528
A.P. Deshpande, Adv.
ORDERS.D. Gundewar, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard by consent of parties.2. The petitioner is working as Physical Training Instructor (for short P.T.I.) in Shri Binzani City College, Umrer Road, Nagpur, run by respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeera Babulalji Modi Vs. Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad ...
Mumbai
Jul-08-1997
Service
Maharashtra employeees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 26 and 26(5)
1998(1)ALLMR54; 1998(4)BomCR425; 1998(1)MhLj175
A.P. Deshpande, Adv.
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Rule issued against respondents Nos. 1 and 2 only. It is not necessary to issue any Rule against respondents Nos. 3 and 4 as no relief is claimed against them.Notice for respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSafiyabi Vs. Shafik Mohd. Khan and anr.
Mumbai
Jun-25-2003
FamilyCriminal
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 4
I(2004)DMC182
S.P. Deshpande, Adv.
P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mrs. S.P. Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. N. Iqbal, the learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. Mirza, the learned A.P.P. for respondent No. 2.2. This revision...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaniram Jagannath Lokhande and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and o ...
Mumbai
Sep-28-1976
Property
Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 2(2), 2(3), 3, 3(1), 3(4), 4 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 19, 31, 226 and 227; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 36(1) and 36(3); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act, 1976
AIR1977Bom240
A.P. Deshpande, Adv.
Deshpande, J.1. The petitioners purchased the lands in dispute from respondent No. 3 for a sum of Rs. 1,800 on 17-4-1963. A few days before they filed an application in this Court under Articles 226 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPragati Construction Co. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Delhi
Jan-29-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Mr. Amit P. Deshpande, Mr. Ajay Verma
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:29. 01.2013 + LPA 763/2003 .. Appellant PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CO. Through : Mr. N.K. Kantawala with Mr. Amit P. Deshpande, Advocate Vs. .. Respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPragati Construction Co. Vs. Dda and anr.
Delhi
Jan-29-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Mr. Amit P. Deshpande, Mr. Ajay Verma
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:29. 01.2013 + LPA 763/2003 .. Appellant PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CO. Through : Mr. N.K. Kantawala with Mr. Amit P. Deshpande, Advocate Vs. .. Respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrithviraj S/O. Ambalal Patel Vs. Bhupendra S/O. Jasubhai Patel and an ...
Mumbai
Jan-06-1993
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138
1993(3)BomCR719
S.N. Loya, Adv.
M.S. Vaidya, J.1. The respondent No. 1-Bhupendra s/o Ambalal Patel was an employee of the petitioner as his Branch Manager-cum-Chief Accountant for several years prior to the year 1989. In an audit which was concluded on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »