Advanced Search Results
Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society) and Oth ...
Mumbai
Mar-25-2015
Land Acquisition
V.M. Kanade, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. By this Petition which is filed under Article 226 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society) and Oth ...
Mumbai
Mar-25-2015
Land Acquisition
V.M. Kanade, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. By this Petition which is filed under Article 226 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. J. Gala Enterprises Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Gove ...
Mumbai
Mar-20-2013
Land Acquisition
K.K. Tated, J. 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 By this Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for enforcement of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A, the Petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Chandrakant Maganlal Shah Vs. the Official Liquidator Appointed a ...
Mumbai
Mar-01-2000
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 457 and 535
2000(3)ALLMR58; 2000(3)BomCR479; (2000)2BOMLR226; 2000(3)MhLj423
Ms. P.D. Anklesaria and ;Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, Advs. i/b ;S.B. Kadam
ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. This order will dispose of Company Application No. 517 of 1999, the Official Liquidator's Report dated 18th March, 1999 and the resubmitted report dated 7th July, 1999.This application has been filed with a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatnakar D. Patade and ors. Vs. Smita P. Dalvi and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-09-2001
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 13
2002(2)ALLMR356
P.D. Anklesaria and ;Niranjani Shetty, Advs., for contesting defendants and ;V.S. Savant, Constituted Attorney of contesting defendants and ;D.R. Dhurat, 1st Assistant to Court Receiver present
V.C. Daga, J.1. The present proceedings are initiated on the report of the Court Commissioner dated 7th September, 2001, whereby; it was brought to the notice of this Court that, subsequent to the order dated 19th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMajor Anurag Pathak Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Dec-06-2006
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 57 and 71; Army Rules - Rule 149; Evidence Act - Sections 45; Defence Service Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
2007(3)ALLMR228
P.D. Anklesaria and ;S.V. Bharucha, Advs.
B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. The petitioner was a Company Commander at Bhatinda, Punjab in 236 Engineer Regiment in the years 1991-93 and his Confidential Reports during the said period showed him to be an Officer of integrity,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. M.S. Builders (Private) Limited and ...
Mumbai
Feb-13-1992
Property
Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 2(9); Bombay Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1985; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2 - Order 23, Rule 1
1992(1)BomCR568
P.D. Anklesaria, Adv., ;L.C. Chogle, Govt. Pld. for appellants in A. Nos. 238, 224, 275 and 551, 1031/1991, ;A.R. Kini, Adv. in A. Nos. 275 and 551 of 1991, ;S.T. Tijoriwala and ;S.N. Vimadalal, Advs
S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. These two appeals and other connected matters which were heard together raise common question of law under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. We heard advocates for parties in all these matters and we...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Prabhakar S. Thakur
Mumbai
Dec-17-2004
Service
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 20(3) and 20(5)
2005(2)BomCR35; 2005(1)MhLj658
P.D. Anklesaria, Adv., ;S. Shreedharan, A.G.P. and ;P.M. Mokashi, A.G.P.
F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. By consent heard forthwith.2. The respondents are aggrieved by the order dated 7-8-2004 and consequential order dated 4-9-2004 passed in Pension Lok Nyayalaya in Pension Matter No. 3 of 2004. The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ors. Vs. Jyoti Constructio ...
Mumbai
Oct-25-2002
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34
2003(2)ALLMR1008; 2003(3)ARBLR489(Bom); 2003(4)BomCR770; 2003(4)MhLj25
P.D. Anklesaria, ;S.J. Billimoria and ;S.H. Ujjainwala, Advs.
ORDERD.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Admit. The learned counsel for the respondent waives service. By consent taken up for hearing and final disposal.2. In these proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Municipal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.D. Chavan (Dr.) Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-17-2002
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226
2002(5)BomCR29
P.D. Anklesaria and ;Shehnaz V. Bharucha, Adv.
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition the petitioner Dr. V.D. Chavan has challenged the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal on 4th May, 2001, allowing the petition of respondent No. 4 herein, quashing the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »