Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p d anklesaria · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 25 2015

Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society) and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

V.M. Kanade, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. By this Petition which is filed under Article 226 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2015

Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society) and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

V.M. Kanade, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. By this Petition which is filed under Article 226 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2013

M/S. J. Gala Enterprises Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Gove ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-20-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

K.K. Tated, J. 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 By this Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for enforcement of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A, the Petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 01 2000

Shri Chandrakant Maganlal Shah Vs. the Official Liquidator Appointed a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-01-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 457 and 535

Reported in : 2000(3)ALLMR58; 2000(3)BomCR479; (2000)2BOMLR226; 2000(3)MhLj423

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. P.D. Anklesaria and ;Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, Advs. i/b ;S.B. Kadam

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. This order will dispose of Company Application No. 517 of 1999, the Official Liquidator's Report dated 18th March, 1999 and the resubmitted report dated 7th July, 1999.This application has been filed with a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2001

Ratnakar D. Patade and ors. Vs. Smita P. Dalvi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-09-2001

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 13

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR356

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Anklesaria and ;Niranjani Shetty, Advs., for contesting defendants and ;V.S. Savant, Constituted Attorney of contesting defendants and ;D.R. Dhurat, 1st Assistant to Court Receiver present

V.C. Daga, J.1. The present proceedings are initiated on the report of the Court Commissioner dated 7th September, 2001, whereby; it was brought to the notice of this Court that, subsequent to the order dated 19th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2006

Major Anurag Pathak Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-06-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 57 and 71; Army Rules - Rule 149; Evidence Act - Sections 45; Defence Service Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR228

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Anklesaria and ;S.V. Bharucha, Advs.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. The petitioner was a Company Commander at Bhatinda, Punjab in 236 Engineer Regiment in the years 1991-93 and his Confidential Reports during the said period showed him to be an Officer of integrity,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1992

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. M.S. Builders (Private) Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 2(9); Bombay Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1985; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2 - Order 23, Rule 1

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR568

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Anklesaria, Adv., ;L.C. Chogle, Govt. Pld. for appellants in A. Nos. 238, 224, 275 and 551, 1031/1991, ;A.R. Kini, Adv. in A. Nos. 275 and 551 of 1991, ;S.T. Tijoriwala and ;S.N. Vimadalal, Advs

S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. These two appeals and other connected matters which were heard together raise common question of law under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. We heard advocates for parties in all these matters and we...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2004

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Prabhakar S. Thakur

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-17-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 20(3) and 20(5)

Reported in : 2005(2)BomCR35; 2005(1)MhLj658

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Anklesaria, Adv., ;S. Shreedharan, A.G.P. and ;P.M. Mokashi, A.G.P.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. By consent heard forthwith.2. The respondents are aggrieved by the order dated 7-8-2004 and consequential order dated 4-9-2004 passed in Pension Lok Nyayalaya in Pension Matter No. 3 of 2004. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2002

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ors. Vs. Jyoti Constructio ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-25-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR1008; 2003(3)ARBLR489(Bom); 2003(4)BomCR770; 2003(4)MhLj25

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Anklesaria, ;S.J. Billimoria and ;S.H. Ujjainwala, Advs.

ORDERD.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Admit. The learned counsel for the respondent waives service. By consent taken up for hearing and final disposal.2. In these proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Municipal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2002

V.D. Chavan (Dr.) Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-17-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR29

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Anklesaria and ;Shehnaz V. Bharucha, Adv.

V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition the petitioner Dr. V.D. Chavan has challenged the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal on 4th May, 2001, allowing the petition of respondent No. 4 herein, quashing the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial