Advanced Search Results
Mantorabai Vs. Paretanbai and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-10-1969
FamilyProperty
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8 and 24; Hindu Widows Re-marriage Act, 1856 - Sections 2
AIR1972MP145; 1972MPLJ7
P.C. Pathak, Adv.
Surajbhan, J.1. This is a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure by Mantorabai (defendant) against the confirming judgment and decree passed by the learned AdditionalDistrict Judge, Bilaspur, whereby he held that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKisan Crusher and Another Vs. Deputy Cane Commissioner, Meerut and Ano ...
Allahabad
May-03-1999
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 3 (1) and 3B; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Rules, 1961 - Rule 13A and 13A (1), (1A), (2), (3) and (4); Constitution of India - Article 226;
1999(3)AWC1854
V.K. Shukla and;P.C. Pathak, Advs.
M. C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order dated 30.12.1997 passed by the Khandsari Inspector-cum-Assessing Officer, Roorkee rejecting the petitioner's option made under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNathu Jeorakhan Vs. Sheopal Kuppa and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-31-1962
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198 and 259; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 494
AIR1963MP47; 1963CriLJ184
P.C. Pathak, Adv.
ORDERS.P. Bhargava, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against: the order, dated 20-7-1961, passed by the Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur, in Criminal Case No. 1554 of 1960.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rama Kant and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Feb-26-1991
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149 and 302
1991CriLJ2289
R.L. Verma, Adv.
1. All the above named appellants stand convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149, I. P. C. and sentenced to life imprisonment. Appellants Ramakant. Satyapal and Banwari have further been convicted under Section 148, I.P.C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Chandra Makhija Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
May-20-1988
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1), 5(1) and 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 162; Evidence Act - Sections 25
1990(0)MPLJ239
Rajendra Singh, ;N.C. Jain and ;Ramesh Shukla, Advs.
P.C. Pathak, J.1. The appellant, a Senior Geohydrologist (Executive Engineer) in Ground Water Survey Department of State of M.P., posted at Khandwa, was convicted under section 5(2) read with section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommittee of Management, Inter College and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ...
Allahabad
Aug-23-2004
ElectionConstitution
(2004)3UPLBEC3001
S.D. Shukla, Adv.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri S.D. Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the petitioners, Sri P.C. Pathak, Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 6 and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5.2. Committee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSandeep Kumar Rathi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-29-2007
Trusts and Societies
2008(1)AWC662
Sri. P. C. Pathak
Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs:(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record of the case and to quash...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Aziz and Others Vs. Salema Bewa
Guwahati
Nov-07-2015
Land Acquisition
Mr. H. Das
Judgment and Order (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the appellants. None appears for the respondent/plaintiff despite service of notice. 2. Mr. Das has submitted that the names of appellant Nos.1 and 2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Prakash Upadhyay Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-02-2008
ElectionCivil
2008(3)AWC2665
Shri. P.C. Pathak
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri P.C. Pathak, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashi Nandan, senior advocate assisted by Shri M.C. Mishra appears for the respondent No. 4. Learned standing counsel appears for State respondents. With...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Srikrishna Rajoria Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-22-1978
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1971 - Sections 341(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1978MP213
C.L. Kotechha, Adv.
J.S. Verma, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Dr. Srikrishna Rajoria, a medical practitioner residing in the town of Harsud and a voter and tax-payer of Harsud...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »