Advanced Search Results

T. Seethapathy and anr. Vs. Principal District and Sessions Judge Rep. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10, 439 and 561; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 227

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT800

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

ORDERB. Prakash Rao, J. 1. This revision petition is filed by the petitioners/defendants under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in I.A. No. 205 of 2008 in O.S. No. 300 of...

Suguna Steels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (App ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Customs

Acts : Warehousing Corporation Act, 1962 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17(3 and 4)45, 111 and 129-A; Constitution of India - Article 14; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Major Port Trusts Act, 1905; International Air ports Authority Act; Customs Act, 1961

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD756; 2000(5)ALT417

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.B. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

ORDERS.R. Nayak, J. 1. The main question that arises for our consideration and decision in this writ petition is whether the Central Warehousing Corporation is obliged in law to release the goods in question stored in...

Sujana Steels Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex. (Appeals), Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 49 and 129B

Reported in : 2002(141)ELT343(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. The main question that arises for our consideration and decision in this Writ Petition is whether the Central Warehousing Corporation is obliged in law to release the goods in question stored in Inland...

Hindustan Mechine Tools Ltd. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 33 and 33(1)

Reported in : 2008(4)ALT31; [2008(118)FLR611]; (2008)IIILLJ706AP

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is a Government owned company. It assails an order passed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, in G.O.Rt. No. 2150, dated 28-10-2005, making a reference of the dispute, raised by...

Duppada Kondala Rao and Others Vs. the Union of India, Rep. by Its Sec ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : P.B.Vijay Kumar. Counsel for the Respondents : A. Rajendra Babu.

ORAL ORDER: {As per Hon'ble Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (Judl.)} Heard Mr.Venkatarama Sarma representing Mr.P.B.Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.A.Rajendra Babu, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 2. It is the case of...

Bandaru China Narayana Murthy Vs. A.P. State Finance Corporation and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Reported in : 2009(2)ALT619

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner intended to establish a modern rice mill at Kovuluwada Village, Bogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District. He acquired Ac.0.50 cents of land for that purpose. With a view to mobilize resources, he...

M. Lakshmanna Vs. Railway Board Rep. by Its

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. P.B Vijay Kumar

1. Heard Sri P.B Vijay Kumar, counsel for the applicant and Sri N.R Devaraj, Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. The respondents are sought to be directed in this O.A. to extend ad hoc and regular promotions...

The Universityof Hyderabad Rep. by It Vs. Sadik HussaIn Andothers

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.1829 of 2013 09-12-2013 The University of Hyderabad Rep. by its Registrar, Central University Campus (P.O.) Gachibowli, Hyderabad-500046...Appellant Sadik Hussain and...

Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Dept. of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(3)ALT429

Advocate for Appellant : G.P. for Services I

ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. Heard.2. When the writ petition is taken up for consideration, Sri P.B. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel for the respondent submitted that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the...

Radhika Thirumalai A. Vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 1964 - Rule 78.3; Police Rules, 1934; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141, 142(1), 144 and 226

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT699

ORDER1. Common law does not oblige an employer to provide appointment to the dependents of a deceased employee. Even the Constitution of India does not specifically oblige any employer to provide compassionate appointments to the legal...