Advanced Search Results

Dr Usharani N vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. P.A. Kulkarni

Reserved on : 03.12.2025Pronounced on : 04.02.2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.101766 OF 2024 (S -...

N.K. Suparna Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 9, 9(1) and 69, 69(1)(B)

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR268]; ILR2004KAR4628; 2004(7)KarLJ599; 2005(3)SLJ507(NULL)

Advocate for Appellant : P.A. Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. What falls for decision - making in this Writ Petition is the interpretation of the words 'after the conclusion of departmental or judicial proceedings' occurring in Clause (b) of Sub-Rule (1) of Rule...

K. Ganesha Vs. Department of Telecom by Its

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ1CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.A. Kulkarni

1. Two interesting questions raised in the present application are:-(i) whether the proceeding or action initiated/taken under Rule 19 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 is in addition to the departmental...

Sri. S.R. Pavana Murthy S/O Late Vs. Union of India (Uoi), to Be

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Subject : Service

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. P.A. Kulkarni

1. These two cases have come up before this Full Bench on a reference made by the Hon'ble Chairman under Section 5(4)(d) of the Administrative Tribunal's Act, 1985 when a Division Bench of this Tribunal which...

M. Manjappa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ132CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.A. Kulkarni

1. The applicant, a Postal Assistant, working under the 4th respondent has filed this O.A. seeking the following reliefs: (a) Quash the order bearing No. A-34012/6/2003-DE, dated: 1.06.2005 of R-2 Directorate, Department of Posts as communicated...

Wasudeo Dattatreya Adke Vs. Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Subject : Education

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ129CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.A. Kulkarni

1. The applicant was appointed as Postal Assistant since 18.10.1966 and was placed in TBOP scale (i.e. grade II) with effect from 31.1.1983.Since the applicant was initially appointed on 18.10.1996, he was to be promoted to...

H.B. Channappa Vs. Nazarrulla Khan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: P.A. Kulkarni, Advocate. For the Respondents: M. Rudraiah, G. Narayana Rao, V. Narayanaswamy, Advocates.

(Prayer: Miscellaneous First Appeal No.4071/2009 is filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 31.5.2008 passed in MVC No. 1338/2006 on the file of District Judge, I fast...

Sou.Sarasvati Arun Shegur and Another Vs. Vikas Co-op. Bank Ltd., Head ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Oral Order:- Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member We heard Mr. P.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners. Revision Petitioners want to withdraw this Revision Petition since grievance has been met by the respondents. Revision...

Sou.Padmavati Anand Shegur and Another Vs. Vikas Co-op. Bank Ltd., Sol ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Oral Order:- Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member We heard Mr. P.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners. Revision Petitioners want to withdraw this Revision Petition since grievance has been met by the respondents. Revision...

Dr. Balmukund Prabhulal Parikh Vs. the Administrative Council of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1996)98BOMLR994

K.G. Shah and N.D. Vyas, JJ.1. These two writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner. They involve common questions. Therefore, it will be convenient to dispose them of by this common judgment and they shall...